HostPLAY vs HYPE — price, size and safety, side by side
PLAY (Base) vs HYPE (Unichain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-15 / 2026-10-16.
PLAY vs HYPE — normalized performance, 2026-10-09 to 2026-10-15T21:43:45
| PLAY | HYPE | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.01763 | $80.30 |
| Market cap | $11.67M | $70.06M |
| 24h volume | $1.06M DEX | $395.32K DEX |
| Liquidity | $301.30K | $5.04M |
| FDV | $124.98M | $9.15M |
| Holders | 6,454 | 4,400 |
| Age (days) | 140 | 423 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- HYPE measures ~6.0× the market cap of PLAY
- HYPE measures ~17× the liquidity of PLAY
- PLAY measures ~2.7× the 24h volume of HYPE
- over the shared window PLAY moved −26.1% while HYPE moved −3.08%
What the data says
PLAY
PLAY at 0x853a7c99227499dba9db8c3a02aa691afdebf841 is a Base asset 140 days into its record at the October 6, 2026 snapshot. The $11.7 million market cap prices under a tenth of the $125.0 million fully-diluted figure on 5.0 billion units — the emission overhang dominates this book's shape.
The book is workable and the tape is hot: $301.3 thousand of tracked depth on $1.1 million of 24-hour volume — the pool cycling itself several times daily. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
HYPE
There's a lot to like about how HYPE's contract is set up. There is no mint function for anyone to inflate the supply with, and no freeze-style control exists in the code, so your holdings stay liquid and movable. With the contract side handled, everything left to think about is ordinary market risk (100/100, 2026-10-09).
By the numbers, HYPE is showing $5.04M of on-chain liquidity, 4,400 holders and 423 days old as of 2026-10-09. The $5.04M pool stands up well to a ~$70.06M cap — depth like that means HYPE absorbs normal flow without the price lurching. 4,400 holders is a decent base; just remember the number alone doesn't reveal how much the top wallets control, so weigh it with the concentration figure. Reassuringly, the wallet that created HYPE holds under 5% of supply (<0.01%) as of 2026-10-09 — the deployer hasn't kept an oversized stake to unload.
FAQ
Which is bigger, PLAY or HYPE?
By tracked market cap: PLAY (Base) measures $11.67M and HYPE (Unichain) measures $70.06M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, PLAY or HYPE?
On the contract checks we publish: PLAY (Base) grades A and HYPE (Unichain) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have PLAY and HYPE performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-09 and 2026-10-15T21:43:45, the measured snapshots show PLAY at −26.1% and HYPE at −3.08%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-09→2026-10-15T21:43:45; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.