HostPIPE vs RDK — price, size and safety, side by side
PIPE (Solana) vs RDK (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17 / 2026-09-17T20:24:07.
PIPE vs RDK — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07
| PIPE | RDK | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.02235 | $2.07K |
| Market cap | $22.22M | — |
| 24h volume | $25.77K | $2.89B |
| Liquidity | $30.02K | $1.74B |
| FDV | $22.22M | — |
| Holders | 2,572 | — |
| Age (days) | — | 1 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- RDK measures ~58,046× the liquidity of PIPE
- RDK measures ~112,028× the 24h volume of PIPE
What the data says
PIPE
PIPE is the token of Pipe Network — a Solana DePIN project building a decentralized content-delivery and edge network. The mint 7s9MoSt7VV1J3jVNnw2AyocsQDBdCkPYz5apQDPKy9i5 is what our scan tracks: $22.2 million market cap, $30 thousand of liquidity and 2,572 holders as of September 16, 2026.
DePIN tokens live or die on whether the physical network gets used, and the honest framing for PIPE is early-stage adoption math: the value case is the network's delivery capacity and demand for it, neither of which a token price can shortcut. Liquidity is modest for the cap — ordinary for this cohort — so size entries against the pool rather than the narrative.
RDK
Sometimes the read on a token is defined by what is missing, and Rudake is that case. HostDeFi's August 19, 2026 capture of RDK — taken when the token was about one day old — has no holder count, no market capitalization, no mint- or freeze-control assessment, and no identifying history. What it does have is a pair of claims from the listing venue: roughly $1.74 billion in pool liquidity and $2.89 billion in daily volume. When the only two numbers present are the two easiest to fabricate, and every number that is hard to fabricate is absent, the shape of the data is itself the disclosure.
Why those two, specifically? Because screeners and aggregators rank by them. An operator who cycles trades against their own pool manufactures "volume" for the cost of gas; reserve figures arrive via feeds that don't audit what they relay. Holder counts and contract state, by contrast, live on-chain where anyone can check — which is why they are the fields that go missing when the goal is to look large rather than be large.
FAQ
Which is bigger, PIPE or RDK?
By tracked market cap: PIPE (Solana) measures $22.22M and RDK (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, PIPE or RDK?
On the contract checks we publish: PIPE (Solana) grades A and RDK (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have PIPE and RDK performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show PIPE at +0.55% and RDK at 0.00%.
More comparisons
PIPE vs RYYPIPE vs FKBPIPE vs CRDPIPE vs CCVRDK vs RYYRDK vs FKBRDK vs CRDRDK vs CCV
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.