HostORBIT vs PAC — price, size and safety, side by side
ORBIT (Blast) vs PAC (Blast) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-17.
ORBIT vs PAC — normalized performance, 2026-10-09 to 2026-10-17T03:15:24
| ORBIT | PAC | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.0004105 | $0.0001155 |
| Market cap | $26.55K | $120.93K |
| 24h volume | $206.52 DEX | $286.57 DEX |
| Liquidity | $11.74K | $1.57K |
| FDV | $43.31K | $9.45K |
| Holders | 47,389 | 97,780 |
| Age (days) | 952 | 939 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- PAC measures ~4.6× the market cap of ORBIT
- ORBIT measures ~7.5× the liquidity of PAC
- PAC measures ~2.1× the holder count of ORBIT
What the data says
ORBIT
ORBIT's contract lacks the two powers a bad actor would want to keep. Nobody can print fresh supply, which keeps every holder's share intact, and no wallet can be blacklisted either, so no one can hold your tokens in place. That leaves ORBIT at a healthy 85/100 as of 2026-10-09, with only normal market risk left to price in.
Here's where ORBIT stands today: deep liquidity of $11.74K, 47,389 wallets holding and an established 952-day history as of 2026-10-09. The $11.74K pool stands up well to a ~$26.55K cap — depth like that means ORBIT absorbs normal flow without the price lurching. The 47,389-wallet base is a reasonable spread of ownership, though a headline count doesn't show whether a few wallets dominate — the concentration read on this page speaks to that. Reassuringly, the wallet that created ORBIT holds under 5% of supply (<0.01%) as of 2026-10-09 — the deployer hasn't kept an oversized stake to unload.
PAC
Right at the foundation, PAC does both of the things you'd hope to see. With minting impossible at the contract level, the supply stays a firm ceiling, and the contract can't pause or block transfers, leaving you free to trade on your own terms. That's why PAC sits comfortably at 85/100 as of 2026-10-09 — the pitfalls that sink most tokens simply aren't here.
On liquidity and holders, PAC shows workable liquidity of $1.57K, a holder base of 97,780 and 939 days old as of 2026-10-09. Against a market cap of about $120.93K, the $1.57K pool is workable rather than deep — fine for ordinary size to move in and out, though a larger position would start to feel the pool's edges. The 97,780-wallet base is a reasonable spread of ownership, though a headline count doesn't show whether a few wallets dominate — the concentration read on this page speaks to that. The creator's own position is small — <0.01% of supply as of 2026-10-09, comfortably under the 5% line the scanners flag — which is what you want to see.
FAQ
Which is bigger, ORBIT or PAC?
By tracked market cap: ORBIT (Blast) measures $26.55K and PAC (Blast) measures $120.93K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, ORBIT or PAC?
On the contract checks we publish: ORBIT (Blast) grades A and PAC (Blast) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have ORBIT and PAC performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-09 and 2026-10-17T03:15:24, the measured snapshots show ORBIT at −7.35% and PAC at −6.86%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-09→2026-10-17T03:15:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.