HostORBIT vs FINGER — price, size and safety, side by side
ORBIT (Blast) vs FINGER (Blast) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-17.
ORBIT vs FINGER — normalized performance, 2026-10-09 to 2026-10-17T03:15:24
| ORBIT | FINGER | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.0004105 | $0.00000001935 |
| Market cap | $26.55K | — |
| 24h volume | $206.52 DEX | $7.03 DEX |
| Liquidity | $11.74K | $9.32K |
| FDV | $43.31K | $13.98K |
| Holders | 47,389 | 4,273 |
| Age (days) | 952 | 953 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- ORBIT measures ~29× the 24h volume of FINGER
- ORBIT measures ~11× the holder count of FINGER
What the data says
ORBIT
ORBIT's contract lacks the two powers a bad actor would want to keep. Nobody can print fresh supply, which keeps every holder's share intact, and no wallet can be blacklisted either, so no one can hold your tokens in place. That leaves ORBIT at a healthy 85/100 as of 2026-10-09, with only normal market risk left to price in.
Here's where ORBIT stands today: deep liquidity of $11.74K, 47,389 wallets holding and an established 952-day history as of 2026-10-09. The $11.74K pool stands up well to a ~$26.55K cap — depth like that means ORBIT absorbs normal flow without the price lurching. The 47,389-wallet base is a reasonable spread of ownership, though a headline count doesn't show whether a few wallets dominate — the concentration read on this page speaks to that. Reassuringly, the wallet that created ORBIT holds under 5% of supply (<0.01%) as of 2026-10-09 — the deployer hasn't kept an oversized stake to unload.
FINGER
Start with the good news — FINGER's contract is clean on the risks that matter. The contract cannot mint new supply, so the float can't be diluted, and no freeze-style control exists in the code, so your holdings stay liquid and movable. That leaves FINGER at a healthy 85/100 as of 2026-10-09, with only normal market risk left to price in.
On liquidity and holders, FINGER shows thin liquidity of $9.32K, a holder base of 4,273 and 953 days old as of 2026-10-09. Treat $9.32K as the room your trade has to work in — the smaller the pool relative to your size, the more your own order moves the price. A 4,273-holder base is a fair start, but distribution matters more than the count — check how much sits in the largest wallets before leaning on it. Reassuringly, the wallet that created FINGER holds under 5% of supply (<0.01%) as of 2026-10-09 — the deployer hasn't kept an oversized stake to unload.
FAQ
Which is bigger, ORBIT or FINGER?
By tracked market cap: ORBIT (Blast) measures $26.55K and FINGER (Blast) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, ORBIT or FINGER?
On the contract checks we publish: ORBIT (Blast) grades A and FINGER (Blast) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have ORBIT and FINGER performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-09 and 2026-10-17T03:15:24, the measured snapshots show ORBIT at −7.35% and FINGER at −3.99%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-09→2026-10-17T03:15:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.