HostONDO vs QNT — price, size and safety, side by side
ONDO (Ethereum) vs QNT (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-16 / 2026-10-16.
ONDO vs QNT — normalized performance, 2026-10-06 to 2026-10-16T21:15:32
| ONDO | QNT | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.4578 | $200.93 |
| Market cap | $2.34B | $3.82B |
| 24h volume | $3.47M DEX | $1.78M DEX |
| Liquidity | $1.31M | $1.17M |
| FDV | $4.80B | $11.93B |
| Holders | 216,744 | 183,572 |
| Age (days) | 977 | 600 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- QNT measures ~1.6× the market cap of ONDO
- ONDO measures ~1.9× the 24h volume of QNT
- over the shared window ONDO moved −8.89% while QNT moved −23.6%
What the data says
ONDO
ONDO is the governance token of Ondo Finance — the firm behind tokenized treasury products like OUSG and the USDY yieldcoin — so its market is a proxy for the real-world-asset trade rather than for one protocol’s cash flows. The deployment at 0xfaba6f8e4a5e8ab82f62fe7c39859fa577269be3 is the canonical Ethereum contract.
Our October 9, 2026 snapshot reads a $2.3 billion market cap ($4.8 billion fully-diluted on the full 10.0 billion supply) across 216,744 holders, with $1.3 million of tracked pool liquidity — thin against the headline — and a 68.8% top-ten share that matches a foundation-heavy cap table mid-unlock.
QNT
There's one detail worth understanding before anything else on QNT. As of the 2026-10-09 read, the contract's mint function hasn't been removed, which means the team can still create new supply. Read the rest of the page with that in mind — it's why QNT is at B (75/100) as of 2026-10-09, with real room to improve.
Looking at the market data, QNT shows a $1.17M pool, 183,572 holders and an established record at 600 days as of 2026-10-09. Against a market cap near $3.82B, that $1.17M of liquidity is the real constraint here: a pool this shallow relative to the cap makes slippage, not the contract, the thing to plan around. With 183,572 holders, ownership is spread wide — the opposite of the handful-of-wallets setup that lets one seller steer the price. The creator's own position is small — <0.01% of supply as of 2026-10-09, comfortably under the 5% line the scanners flag — which is what you want to see.
FAQ
Which is bigger, ONDO or QNT?
By tracked market cap: ONDO (Ethereum) measures $2.34B and QNT (Ethereum) measures $3.82B — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, ONDO or QNT?
On the contract checks we publish: ONDO (Ethereum) grades B and QNT (Ethereum) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have ONDO and QNT performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-06 and 2026-10-16T21:15:32, the measured snapshots show ONDO at −8.89% and QNT at −23.6%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-06→2026-10-16T21:15:32; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.