HostNVDAC vs RDK — price, size and safety, side by side
NVDAC (Base) vs RDK (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17T20:24:07 / 2026-09-17T20:24:07.
NVDAC vs RDK — normalized performance, 2026-08-31 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07
| NVDAC | RDK | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $215.46 | $2.07K |
| Market cap | — | — |
| 24h volume | $11.52M | $2.89B |
| Liquidity | $2.14M | $1.74B |
| FDV | — | — |
| Holders | — | — |
| Age (days) | 35 | 1 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- RDK measures ~814× the liquidity of NVDAC
- RDK measures ~250× the 24h volume of NVDAC
What the data says
NVDAC
NVDAC is a tokenized NVIDIA Corporation share — an on-chain equity claim on the AI-capex winner, issued under a real-asset wrapper that maps the token to NVDA exposure. The deployment 0xb20000000000000000000078ee7ce2fe4908108c is the Base deployment; our September 16, 2026 snapshot reads $2.1 million of tracked pool liquidity.
The honest frame is the tokenized-equity one: NVDAC's value is a claim on whoever holds the underlying shares or hedges them — the token inherits the issuer's custody model plus NVDA's market price, and its 24/7 trading means it can gap against the actual stock when equity markets are closed. On-chain depth for tokenized equities typically understates the product because most holders sit in wallets, not pools.
RDK
Sometimes the read on a token is defined by what is missing, and Rudake is that case. HostDeFi's August 19, 2026 capture of RDK — taken when the token was about one day old — has no holder count, no market capitalization, no mint- or freeze-control assessment, and no identifying history. What it does have is a pair of claims from the listing venue: roughly $1.74 billion in pool liquidity and $2.89 billion in daily volume. When the only two numbers present are the two easiest to fabricate, and every number that is hard to fabricate is absent, the shape of the data is itself the disclosure.
Why those two, specifically? Because screeners and aggregators rank by them. An operator who cycles trades against their own pool manufactures "volume" for the cost of gas; reserve figures arrive via feeds that don't audit what they relay. Holder counts and contract state, by contrast, live on-chain where anyone can check — which is why they are the fields that go missing when the goal is to look large rather than be large.
FAQ
Which is bigger, NVDAC or RDK?
By tracked market cap: NVDAC (Base) measures — and RDK (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, NVDAC or RDK?
On the contract checks we publish: NVDAC (Base) grades B and RDK (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have NVDAC and RDK performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-08-31 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show NVDAC at −1.05% and RDK at 0.00%.
More comparisons
NVDAC vs RYYNVDAC vs FKBNVDAC vs CRDNVDAC vs CCVRDK vs RYYRDK vs FKBRDK vs CRDRDK vs CCV
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-08-31→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.