HostNUB vs NOS — price, size and safety, side by side
NUB (Solana) vs NOS (Solana) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-06 / 2026-10-17.
NUB vs NOS — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-10-06
| NUB | NOS | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.004415 | $0.5186 |
| Market cap | $4.41M | $43.81M |
| 24h volume | $143.77K DEX | $326.56K DEX |
| Liquidity | $490.30K | $479.71K |
| FDV | $4.41M | $43.81M |
| Holders | 23,753 | 49,502 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- NOS measures ~9.9× the market cap of NUB
- NOS measures ~2.3× the 24h volume of NUB
- NOS measures ~2.1× the holder count of NUB
- over the shared window NUB moved −15.5% while NOS moved +140%
What the data says
NUB
NUB — nubcat — is a Solana cat-meme with one of the strongest market structures in the cohort. The mint GtDZKAqvMZMnti46ZewMiXCa4oXF4bZxwQPoKzXPFxZn is what our scan tracks: $4.4 million market cap, $490 thousand of liquidity and 23,753 holders as of October 6, 2026.
The honest read: the figures describe what a surviving cat-coin looks like — nearly a half-million-dollar pool and twenty-four thousand holders, better market mechanics than most tokens ten times its size. Still a meme: the valuation is community attention made liquid. The tradability is the differentiator.
NOS
NOS is Nosana — a decentralized GPU compute network on Solana, matching idle GPU supply with AI inference demand. The October 6, 2026 snapshot reads $43.8 million across 49,502 wallets on mint nosXBVoaCTtYdLvKY6Csb4AC8JCdQKKAaWYtx2ZMoo7.
Nosana is a real DePIN thesis: distributed GPU capacity sold to AI workloads, settled on-chain. The token's value tracks whether that marketplace wins inference volume against centralized GPU clouds and rival DePIN networks — an actual competitive question, which makes it priced on fundamentals as much as narrative.
FAQ
Which is bigger, NUB or NOS?
By tracked market cap: NUB (Solana) measures $4.41M and NOS (Solana) measures $43.81M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, NUB or NOS?
On the contract checks we publish: NUB (Solana) grades A and NOS (Solana) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have NUB and NOS performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-10-06, the measured snapshots show NUB at −15.5% and NOS at +140%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-10-06; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.