Open app

NOMU vs CCV — price, size and safety, side by side

NOMU (Solana) vs CCV (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17 / 2026-09-17T23:42:29.

NOMUB

$0.003749
Nomu on Solana
Trade NOMU
vs

CCVB

$2.01K
Cucuvo on Base
Trade CCV

NOMU vs CCV — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-17T23:42:29

100 — shared start
NOMU +3.20%  ·  CCV 0.00% — both series rebased to 100 at the first measured point in the shared window; not a raw-price chart.
NOMUCCV
Price$0.003749$2.01K
Market cap$3.83M
24h volume$694.44$2.74B
Liquidity$32.72K$1.69B
FDV$3.83M
Holders658
Age (days)1
Safety gradeBB

Where they differ

What the data says

NOMU

NOMU is a small-cap Solana token with a modest holder base. The mint NomuBwKJEvJ8d4dsaq7NZoHaXWXzKcfke1c7Y8ruFYL is what our scan tracks: $3.8 million market cap, $33 thousand of liquidity and 658 holders as of September 16, 2026.

The honest read: under seven hundred holders on a nearly-four-million cap is the concentration profile of a token whose price is set by few wallets — a real market, but a thin crowd. In this band the checks that matter are top-holder share and contract ownership; our grade-B score reflects the in-between result.

Full NOMU safety read →

CCV

Cucuvo belongs to a genre, and the genre is the story. Base's low fees make it one of the cheapest places in crypto to launch a token, and each week produces a wave of day-old tickers whose listing-feed numbers are tuned to catch screener sorts. CCV entered HostDeFi's records on August 19, 2026 — roughly one day after it began existing — carrying the wave's characteristic costume: about $1.69 billion in claimed liquidity and $2.74 billion in claimed daily volume, wrapped around a recorded market cap of zero and no holder count at all. Real markets earn numbers like those over years and show millions of holders doing it; this profile shows the numbers and nothing that would produce them.

The claimed figures come from venue feeds, and venue feeds report what pools tell them — including pools whose "volume" is an operator trading with themselves and whose "reserves" are valued against a price the same operator sets. Our capture graded the market shape those feeds described, which is why the grade on this page should be read as a grade of the costume, not the token. The contract at 0xedb2bbe57fe65de82039bed17d47d22c083e5609 — its mint powers, owner functions, and whether a buyer can actually sell — was not assessed in this snapshot.

Full CCV safety read →

FAQ

Which is bigger, NOMU or CCV?

By tracked market cap: NOMU (Solana) measures $3.83M and CCV (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.

Which is safer, NOMU or CCV?

On the contract checks we publish: NOMU (Solana) grades B and CCV (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.

How have NOMU and CCV performed over the shared window?

Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-17T23:42:29, the measured snapshots show NOMU at +3.20% and CCV at 0.00%.

More comparisons

NOMU vs RYYNOMU vs FKBNOMU vs CRDNOMU vs RDKCCV vs RYYCCV vs FKBCCV vs CRDCCV vs RDK

The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-17T23:42:29; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.

Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.