Open app

NEST vs CCV — price, size and safety, side by side

NEST (Solana) vs CCV (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17 / 2026-09-17T23:42:29.

NESTA

$0.002045
Nest on Solana
Trade NEST
vs

CCVB

$2.01K
Cucuvo on Base
Trade CCV

NEST vs CCV — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-17T23:42:29

100 — shared start
NEST −26.9%  ·  CCV 0.00% — both series rebased to 100 at the first measured point in the shared window; not a raw-price chart.
NESTCCV
Price$0.002045$2.01K
Market cap$788.91K
24h volume$7.08K$2.74B
Liquidity$196.81K$1.69B
FDV$1.98M
Holders2,641
Age (days)1
Safety gradeAB

Where they differ

What the data says

NEST

NEST is a mid-cap Solana token at mint 68Nq68CrtLVpyvK5Un7UADiNczaGf39hBbj3diRsYj6D. The September 16, 2026 snapshot shows about $197 thousand of liquidity, a market capitalization near $789 thousand, and roughly 2,641 holders.

A name note first: "Nest" is shared by several unrelated projects across chains — an RWA-vault brand, gaming tokens, and community coins all use it — so identity-by-ticker is useless here; the mint string is the only reliable handle on which NEST this is.

Full NEST safety read →

CCV

Cucuvo belongs to a genre, and the genre is the story. Base's low fees make it one of the cheapest places in crypto to launch a token, and each week produces a wave of day-old tickers whose listing-feed numbers are tuned to catch screener sorts. CCV entered HostDeFi's records on August 19, 2026 — roughly one day after it began existing — carrying the wave's characteristic costume: about $1.69 billion in claimed liquidity and $2.74 billion in claimed daily volume, wrapped around a recorded market cap of zero and no holder count at all. Real markets earn numbers like those over years and show millions of holders doing it; this profile shows the numbers and nothing that would produce them.

The claimed figures come from venue feeds, and venue feeds report what pools tell them — including pools whose "volume" is an operator trading with themselves and whose "reserves" are valued against a price the same operator sets. Our capture graded the market shape those feeds described, which is why the grade on this page should be read as a grade of the costume, not the token. The contract at 0xedb2bbe57fe65de82039bed17d47d22c083e5609 — its mint powers, owner functions, and whether a buyer can actually sell — was not assessed in this snapshot.

Full CCV safety read →

FAQ

Which is bigger, NEST or CCV?

By tracked market cap: NEST (Solana) measures $788.91K and CCV (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.

Which is safer, NEST or CCV?

On the contract checks we publish: NEST (Solana) grades A and CCV (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.

How have NEST and CCV performed over the shared window?

Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-17T23:42:29, the measured snapshots show NEST at −26.9% and CCV at 0.00%.

More comparisons

NEST vs RYYNEST vs FKBNEST vs CRDNEST vs RDKCCV vs RYYCCV vs FKBCCV vs CRDCCV vs RDK

The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-17T23:42:29; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.

Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.