HostNES vs APE — price, size and safety, side by side
NES (Ethereum) vs APE (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-16.
NES vs APE — normalized performance, 2026-09-27 to 2026-10-16T21:15:32
| NES | APE | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.0003344 | $0.1503 |
| Market cap | $75.57K | $141.86M |
| 24h volume | $71.64 DEX | $162.51K DEX |
| Liquidity | $264.43K | $235.50K |
| FDV | $111.63K | $141.85M |
| Holders | 28,890 | 189,618 |
| Age (days) | 50 | 599 |
| Safety grade | B | A |
Where they differ
- APE measures ~1,877× the market cap of NES
- APE measures ~2,268× the 24h volume of NES
- APE measures ~6.6× the holder count of NES
- over the shared window NES moved −37.4% while APE moved −5.14%
What the data says
NES
Nesa (NES) is an AI-inference network token — a small-cap bet on decentralized model serving — at contract 0x230f1e241c621d5af670dad83ebcdd18971e2995. Our October 6, 2026 read shows $264 thousand of tracked pool liquidity.
The honest shape: AI-inference is a crowded thesis, and the differentiator is never the name — it is whether real inference volume settles through the network and whether the token captures any of it. At this size, treat the claim as unproven until the usage numbers say otherwise.
APE
APE — ApeCoin at 0x4d224452801aced8b2f0aebe155379bb5d594381 — is the token of the Bored Ape ecosystem, issued to Yuga Labs' NFT holders at the 2022 peak and governing the APE DAO and its ApeChain ambitions since. It is a brand token of crypto's most famous NFT franchise, priced on what remains of that brand's gravity.
The October 9, 2026 snapshot reads a $141.9 million market cap — fully circulating at the one-billion supply — with $235.5 thousand of tracked on-chain depth and 189,618 holders. That on-chain book is thin for a cap this size: APE's real trading happens on centralized venues, so the price you see on-chain leans on them.
FAQ
Which is bigger, NES or APE?
By tracked market cap: NES (Ethereum) measures $75.57K and APE (Ethereum) measures $141.86M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, NES or APE?
On the contract checks we publish: NES (Ethereum) grades B and APE (Ethereum) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have NES and APE performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-27 and 2026-10-16T21:15:32, the measured snapshots show NES at −37.4% and APE at −5.14%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-27→2026-10-16T21:15:32; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.