HostNECT vs POLLEN — price, size and safety, side by side
NECT (Berachain) vs POLLEN (Berachain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-17.
NECT vs POLLEN — normalized performance, 2026-10-09 to 2026-10-17T03:15:24
| NECT | POLLEN | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.9985 | $0.0001645 |
| Market cap | $4.44M | $70.25K |
| 24h volume | $16.86K DEX | $25.72 DEX |
| Liquidity | $55.68K | $11.83K |
| FDV | $267.23K | $119.57K |
| Holders | 14,704 | 17,499 |
| Age (days) | 358 | 558 |
| Safety grade | E | A |
Where they differ
- NECT measures ~63× the market cap of POLLEN
- NECT measures ~4.7× the liquidity of POLLEN
- NECT measures ~656× the 24h volume of POLLEN
- over the shared window NECT moved +6.25% while POLLEN moved −45.4%
What the data says
NECT
The most important thing to know about NECT is its authority setup. Right now NECT's contract keeps its mint and freeze levers (2026-10-09 snapshot), which means the team can still create new supply or freeze transfers. It's the main reason the read sits at 21/100 (grade E) today — and the clearest path to a higher grade is simply removing it.
Market-wise, NECT carries workable liquidity of $55.68K, 14,704 holders and a maturing record at 358 days as of 2026-10-09. The $55.68K pool against a ~$4.44M cap is a middling ratio — enough for typical trades to clear, but worth respecting if you're trading size. 14,704 holders is a decent base; just remember the number alone doesn't reveal how much the top wallets control, so weigh it with the concentration figure. On concentration, the deployer wallet holds just <0.01% of NECT as of 2026-10-09, so the person who launched it isn't sitting on a dominant share.
POLLEN
The contract behind POLLEN is about as reassuring as they come. With minting impossible at the contract level, the supply stays a firm ceiling, and no wallet can be blacklisted either, so no one can hold your tokens in place. Neither lever existing is the main reason POLLEN's 85/100 comes down to market factors, not contract ones (2026-10-09).
Market-wise, POLLEN carries $11.83K of on-chain liquidity, a holder base of 17,499 and an established 558-day history as of 2026-10-09. Encouragingly, that $11.83K pool is deep relative to a market cap of about $70.25K — the kind of ratio that lets real size move in and out without much slippage. 17,499 holders is a decent base; just remember the number alone doesn't reveal how much the top wallets control, so weigh it with the concentration figure. Reassuringly, the wallet that created POLLEN holds under 5% of supply (<0.01%) as of 2026-10-09 — the deployer hasn't kept an oversized stake to unload.
FAQ
Which is bigger, NECT or POLLEN?
By tracked market cap: NECT (Berachain) measures $4.44M and POLLEN (Berachain) measures $70.25K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, NECT or POLLEN?
On the contract checks we publish: NECT (Berachain) grades E and POLLEN (Berachain) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have NECT and POLLEN performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-09 and 2026-10-17T03:15:24, the measured snapshots show NECT at +6.25% and POLLEN at −45.4%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-09→2026-10-17T03:15:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.