HostNECT vs IBGT — price, size and safety, side by side
NECT (Berachain) vs IBGT (Berachain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-17.
NECT vs IBGT — normalized performance, 2026-10-09 to 2026-10-17T03:15:24
| NECT | IBGT | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.9985 | $0.1871 |
| Market cap | $4.44M | $567.09K |
| 24h volume | $16.86K DEX | $90.50 DEX |
| Liquidity | $55.68K | $38.00K |
| FDV | $267.23K | $567.09K |
| Holders | 14,704 | 25,840 |
| Age (days) | 358 | 588 |
| Safety grade | E | C |
Where they differ
- NECT measures ~7.8× the market cap of IBGT
- NECT measures ~186× the 24h volume of IBGT
- IBGT measures ~1.8× the holder count of NECT
- over the shared window NECT moved +6.25% while IBGT moved −14.5%
What the data says
NECT
The most important thing to know about NECT is its authority setup. Right now NECT's contract keeps its mint and freeze levers (2026-10-09 snapshot), which means the team can still create new supply or freeze transfers. It's the main reason the read sits at 21/100 (grade E) today — and the clearest path to a higher grade is simply removing it.
Market-wise, NECT carries workable liquidity of $55.68K, 14,704 holders and a maturing record at 358 days as of 2026-10-09. The $55.68K pool against a ~$4.44M cap is a middling ratio — enough for typical trades to clear, but worth respecting if you're trading size. 14,704 holders is a decent base; just remember the number alone doesn't reveal how much the top wallets control, so weigh it with the concentration figure. On concentration, the deployer wallet holds just <0.01% of NECT as of 2026-10-09, so the person who launched it isn't sitting on a dominant share.
IBGT
The most important thing to know about IBGT is its authority setup. As of the 2026-10-09 read, the contract's mint function hasn't been removed, so whoever holds it can create new supply at any point. It's the main reason the read sits at 60/100 (grade C) today — and the clearest path to a higher grade is simply removing it.
On the market side, IBGT brings a $38.00K pool, 25,840 wallets holding and an established 588-day history as of 2026-10-09. Against roughly $567.09K in market cap, the $38.00K of liquidity is genuinely healthy: deep enough that ordinary trades clear cleanly, which is exactly what you want to see. A 25,840-holder base is a fair start, but distribution matters more than the count — check how much sits in the largest wallets before leaning on it. Reassuringly, the wallet that created IBGT holds under 5% of supply (<0.01%) as of 2026-10-09 — the deployer hasn't kept an oversized stake to unload.
FAQ
Which is bigger, NECT or IBGT?
By tracked market cap: NECT (Berachain) measures $4.44M and IBGT (Berachain) measures $567.09K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, NECT or IBGT?
On the contract checks we publish: NECT (Berachain) grades E and IBGT (Berachain) grades C. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have NECT and IBGT performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-09 and 2026-10-17T03:15:24, the measured snapshots show NECT at +6.25% and IBGT at −14.5%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-09→2026-10-17T03:15:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.