HostNEAR vs ZC — price, size and safety, side by side
NEAR (Ethereum) vs ZC (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-16 / 2026-10-16.
NEAR vs ZC — normalized performance, 2026-10-06 to 2026-10-16T21:15:32
| NEAR | ZC | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $5.16 | $0.002615 |
| Market cap | $15.74M | $17.94M |
| 24h volume | $995.23K DEX | $4.04M DEX |
| Liquidity | $420.92K | $326.97K |
| FDV | $15.78M | $18.08M |
| Holders | 14,552 | 5,596 |
| Age (days) | 904 | 6 |
| Safety grade | B | A |
Where they differ
- ZC measures ~4.1× the 24h volume of NEAR
- NEAR measures ~2.6× the holder count of ZC
- over the shared window NEAR moved −2.03% while ZC moved −86.7%
What the data says
NEAR
NEAR at 0x85f17cf997934a597031b2e18a9ab6ebd4b9f6a4 is the Ethereum-issued claim on the NEAR asset — a wrapped deployment 904 days into its record at the October 6, 2026 snapshot, priced at a $15.7 million market cap across 3.8 million local units.
The tape outpaces the book: $995.2 thousand of 24-hour volume against $420.9 thousand of workable tracked depth — turnover above twice the pool daily, the signature of an asset that clears through routed flow rather than deep standing liquidity. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
ZC
There's a lot to like about how ZC's contract is set up. Nobody can print fresh supply, which keeps every holder's share intact, and the contract can't pause or block transfers, leaving you free to trade on your own terms. Neither lever existing is the main reason ZC's 90/100 comes down to market factors, not contract ones (2026-10-09).
By the numbers, ZC is showing workable liquidity of $326.97K, 5,596 holders and a brand-new record at 6 days as of 2026-10-09. Against a market cap of about $17.94M, the $326.97K pool is workable rather than deep — fine for ordinary size to move in and out, though a larger position would start to feel the pool's edges. The 5,596-wallet base is a reasonable spread of ownership, though a headline count doesn't show whether a few wallets dominate — the concentration read on this page speaks to that. On concentration, the deployer wallet holds just 0.73% of ZC as of 2026-10-09, so the person who launched it isn't sitting on a dominant share.
FAQ
Which is bigger, NEAR or ZC?
By tracked market cap: NEAR (Ethereum) measures $15.74M and ZC (Ethereum) measures $17.94M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, NEAR or ZC?
On the contract checks we publish: NEAR (Ethereum) grades B and ZC (Ethereum) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have NEAR and ZC performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-06 and 2026-10-16T21:15:32, the measured snapshots show NEAR at −2.03% and ZC at −86.7%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-06→2026-10-16T21:15:32; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.