HostMUC vs QUID — price, size and safety, side by side
MUC (Base) vs QUID (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-15 / 2026-10-16.
MUC vs QUID — normalized performance, 2026-10-06 to 2026-10-15T21:43:45
| MUC | QUID | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $874.83 | $0.05992 |
| Market cap | $959.97K | $10.28M |
| 24h volume | $5.43M DEX | $534.41K DEX |
| Liquidity | $498.38K | $436.06K |
| FDV | $946.79K | $71.83M |
| Holders | — | 14,990 |
| Age (days) | 14 | 16 |
| Safety grade | B | A |
Where they differ
- QUID measures ~11× the market cap of MUC
- MUC measures ~10× the 24h volume of QUID
- over the shared window MUC moved −18.0% while QUID moved −3.61%
What the data says
MUC
There's a small gap on this page — MUC's contract flags weren't fully confirmed as of 2026-10-09. So rather than assume anything either way, it's worth a direct check, and the scanner above reads it live in a couple of seconds before you trade.
Looking at the market data, MUC shows deep liquidity of $498.38K and a brand-new 14-day history as of 2026-10-09. Against roughly $959.97K in market cap, the $498.38K of liquidity is genuinely healthy: deep enough that ordinary trades clear cleanly, which is exactly what you want to see.
QUID
QUID — trading as "Squid" on Base, 0x1a44233fae8d50f1aeb3a5d58dd426ff4814cb53 — carries the single most infamous name in token history. The original SQUID, launched around the Squid Game series in late 2021, became the canonical honeypot: it rocketed thousands of percent while its contract quietly blocked every sell, then collapsed to zero in minutes when the deployer exited.
This contract is not that token — different chain, different address, 16 days tracked in the October 6, 2026 snapshot with $436 thousand of liquidity and roughly $14.4 million of daily volume. But the name choice is itself a data point: a deployer who picks the most famous scam ticker in crypto is either making an ironic joke or fishing for exactly the buyers the joke attracts. Neither possibility says the contract is malicious — the sell-side check is what settles that, and the honeypot test is the required first step on this page more than almost any other.
FAQ
Which is bigger, MUC or QUID?
By tracked market cap: MUC (Base) measures $959.97K and QUID (Base) measures $10.28M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, MUC or QUID?
On the contract checks we publish: MUC (Base) grades B and QUID (Base) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have MUC and QUID performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-06 and 2026-10-15T21:43:45, the measured snapshots show MUC at −18.0% and QUID at −3.61%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-06→2026-10-15T21:43:45; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.