HostMU vs PENGU — price, size and safety, side by side
MU (Solana) vs PENGU (Solana) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-17.
MU vs PENGU — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-10-17T03:15:24
| MU | PENGU | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $881.18 | $0.007517 |
| Market cap | $4.07M | $776.51M |
| 24h volume | $3.62M DEX | $19.04M DEX |
| Liquidity | $5.23M | $5.00M |
| FDV | $4.07M | $776.51M |
| Holders | 4,907 | 559,492 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- PENGU measures ~191× the market cap of MU
- PENGU measures ~5.3× the 24h volume of MU
- PENGU measures ~114× the holder count of MU
- over the shared window MU moved −14.1% while PENGU moved −8.96%
What the data says
MU
MU is the Micron Technology xStock — a tokenized claim on the US memory-chip maker's equity, part of the Backpack Securities xStocks family that wraps public shares for on-chain trading. The mint MUxEsUKSMACyw5fZf68wxf5FLnZVhtU9CwH8uNNGay1 is the Solana deployment; our October 6, 2026 snapshot reads $5.2 million of tracked pool liquidity and grades it A.
The honest frame is the shared xStocks one: a claim on custodied shares routed through the wrapper's terms — the equity exposure is real, and so are the 24/7-vs-market-hours gap risk and the wrapper's own counterparty layer. Micron's AI-memory thesis is what the token ultimately tracks; the wrapper is just how it reaches the chain.
PENGU
PENGU is what happens when an NFT brand outgrows its JPEGs. Pudgy Penguins spent years building the rare thing in crypto — mainstream distribution, from viral GIF packs to toys on retail shelves — and in December 2024 attached a token to that brand with one of the widest airdrops Solana has hosted. As of the October 6, 2026 snapshot, PENGU carries roughly $776.5 million of market capitalization across 559,492 holders at mint 2zMMhcVQEXDtdE6vsFS7S7D5oUodfJHE8vd1gnBouauv.
The chain-level mechanics read clean: mint authority revoked, freeze authority revoked. Supply is fixed at what exists, and no authority can freeze a wallet out of selling — the two structural failures behind most of the losses this site documents, both absent here. A holder base above half a million wallets, seeded by the airdrop, means ownership is broad in a way most brand tokens never achieve; broad bases don't prevent drawdowns, but they make single-wallet price control much harder.
FAQ
Which is bigger, MU or PENGU?
By tracked market cap: MU (Solana) measures $4.07M and PENGU (Solana) measures $776.51M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, MU or PENGU?
On the contract checks we publish: MU (Solana) grades A and PENGU (Solana) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have MU and PENGU performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-10-17T03:15:24, the measured snapshots show MU at −14.1% and PENGU at −8.96%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-10-17T03:15:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.