HostMU vs CRD — price, size and safety, side by side
MU (Solana) vs CRD (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17 / 2026-09-17T20:24:07.
MU vs CRD — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07
| MU | CRD | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $979.20 | $2.13K |
| Market cap | $6.51M | — |
| 24h volume | $2.47M | $4.03B |
| Liquidity | $1.66M | $1.99B |
| FDV | $6.51M | — |
| Holders | 4,863 | — |
| Age (days) | — | 1 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- CRD measures ~1,194× the liquidity of MU
- CRD measures ~1,633× the 24h volume of MU
What the data says
MU
MU is the Micron Technology xStock — a tokenized claim on the US memory-chip maker's equity, part of the Backpack Securities xStocks family that wraps public shares for on-chain trading. The mint MUxEsUKSMACyw5fZf68wxf5FLnZVhtU9CwH8uNNGay1 is the Solana deployment; our September 16, 2026 snapshot reads $1.7 million of tracked pool liquidity and grades it A.
The honest frame is the shared xStocks one: a claim on custodied shares routed through the wrapper's terms — the equity exposure is real, and so are the 24/7-vs-market-hours gap risk and the wrapper's own counterparty layer. Micron's AI-memory thesis is what the token ultimately tracks; the wrapper is just how it reaches the chain.
CRD
Four billion dollars is what CRD's venue feed claimed the token traded in a single day — on August 19, 2026, when Cirudu was approximately one day old. Put that figure next to the rest of the same snapshot: about $1.99 billion in claimed liquidity, a recorded market capitalization of zero, and no holder count at all. For scale, four billion dollars of daily turnover is what entire major exchanges do; a nameless day-old Base token reporting it while having no measurable owners is describing something that cannot exist. The parsimonious explanation is reported-figure inflation — trading volume manufactured against the token's own pools so that listing feeds repeat impressive numbers.
This page's honest scope: HostDeFi's EVM snapshot grades market structure from those very venue feeds, which is why the incoherence above is the most valuable output the capture produced. The contract itself — mint powers, owner functions, transfer taxes, honeypot mechanics at 0x95735d3f68d045c942afb9ea1090f6b03150bfab — was not assessed in this snapshot, and with a token in this category, the contract is where the actual answer lives. Run the live scan above; it reads the chain, not the feed.
FAQ
Which is bigger, MU or CRD?
By tracked market cap: MU (Solana) measures $6.51M and CRD (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, MU or CRD?
On the contract checks we publish: MU (Solana) grades A and CRD (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have MU and CRD performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show MU at −4.55% and CRD at 0.00%.
More comparisons
MU vs RYYMU vs FKBMU vs RDKMU vs CCVCRD vs RYYCRD vs FKBCRD vs RDKCRD vs CCV
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.