HostMRVLX vs GMT — price, size and safety, side by side
MRVLX (Solana) vs GMT (Solana) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17 / 2026-09-17.
MRVLX vs GMT — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07
| MRVLX | GMT | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $237.03 | $0.007237 |
| Market cap | $40.35M | $10.99M |
| 24h volume | $240.05 | $18.05K |
| Liquidity | $1.99K | $1.89K |
| FDV | $40.35M | $10.99M |
| Holders | 390 | 418,712 |
| Safety grade | C | A |
Where they differ
- MRVLX measures ~3.7× the market cap of GMT
- GMT measures ~75× the 24h volume of MRVLX
- GMT measures ~1,074× the holder count of MRVLX
- over the shared window MRVLX moved +7.60% while GMT moved −3.81%
What the data says
MRVLX
MRVLX is the xStock for Marvell Technology — Backed Finance's tokenized wrapper for a data-center semiconductor name. The mint XsuxRGDzbLjnJ72v74b7p9VY6N66uYgTCyfwwRjVCJA is what our scan tracks: $40.4 million market cap on $2.0 thousand of liquidity and 390 holders as of September 16, 2026.
Those figures describe a cap with almost no door: under two thousand dollars of pool liquidity underneath a roughly forty-million-dollar token supply. Treat the printed cap as arithmetic, not a valuation you could realize — and note the holder count is the smallest in the xStock line. The wrapper mechanics are Backed-standard; the liquidity posture is the outlier and is why our scan grades it C.
GMT
GMT is the half of STEPN that was supposed to be scarce. Where GST (also in our corpus) was the freely-minted earn token, GMT was the governance asset — capped supply, staged unlocks, the token that briefly commanded a multi-billion-dollar valuation in 2022 when move-to-earn looked like the future of fitness. The Solana deployment at mint 7i5KKsX2weiTkry7jA4ZwSuXGhs5eJBEjY8vVxR4pfRx now reads, in HostDeFi's September 16, 2026 snapshot: 418,712 holders, roughly $11.0 million of market capitalization — and $1.9 thousand of tracked on-chain liquidity, the thinnest pool depth of any token this site grades.
That last figure demands its explanation, because it's less damning than it looks and more instructive: GMT is a multi-chain token (it lives on BNB Chain and Ethereum too) whose real trading migrated to centralized exchanges years ago. The Solana pools our read samples are an abandoned side door, not the market. But the practical consequence for a Solana-wallet holder is identical either way — swapping GMT on-chain at any size means catastrophic slippage, and the honest route out runs through a CEX deposit.
FAQ
Which is bigger, MRVLX or GMT?
By tracked market cap: MRVLX (Solana) measures $40.35M and GMT (Solana) measures $10.99M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, MRVLX or GMT?
On the contract checks we publish: MRVLX (Solana) grades C and GMT (Solana) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have MRVLX and GMT performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show MRVLX at +7.60% and GMT at −3.81%.
More comparisons
MRVLX vs RYYMRVLX vs FKBMRVLX vs CRDMRVLX vs RDKGMT vs RYYGMT vs FKBGMT vs CRDGMT vs RDK
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.