HostMPLX vs WNEAR — price, size and safety, side by side
MPLX (Solana) vs WNEAR (Solana) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17 / 2026-09-17.
MPLX vs WNEAR — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07
| MPLX | WNEAR | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.03274 | $3.04 |
| Market cap | $15.04M | $2.89M |
| 24h volume | $202.17K | $2.29M |
| Liquidity | $1.08M | $1.14M |
| FDV | $31.92M | $2.89M |
| Holders | 24,617 | 6,632 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- MPLX measures ~5.2× the market cap of WNEAR
- WNEAR measures ~11× the 24h volume of MPLX
- MPLX measures ~3.7× the holder count of WNEAR
- over the shared window MPLX moved +1.40% while WNEAR moved +32.8%
What the data says
MPLX
MPLX is Metaplex's token — and Metaplex is closer to public infrastructure than a project: the token-metadata standard, Candy Machine launches, and compressed-NFT tooling that most Solana assets were minted through. The mint METAewgxyPbgwsseH8T16a39CQ5VyVxZi9zXiDPY18m is the canonical deployment; our September 16, 2026 read shows $15.0 million market cap ($31.9 million fully diluted), $1.1 million of pool liquidity, 24,617 holders.
The honest read: Metaplex is everywhere underneath Solana — which is precisely why the token question is harder than the protocol question. Ubiquity as infrastructure does not automatically accrue to a token; the bet is on MPLX's capture mechanisms (protocol fees, tooling demand) maturing. Wide holder distribution and real usage are the strengths; thin protocol-token linkage is the caveat.
WNEAR
WNEAR is NEAR's token wrapped onto Solana — native NEAR locked on its own chain, a claim receipt trading here. The mint 3ZLekZYq2qkZiSpnSvabjit34tUkjSwD1JFuW9as9wBG is what our scan tracks: $2.9 million market cap, $1.1 million of pool liquidity, 6,632 holders as of September 16, 2026.
The honest mechanics of any wrapped asset: your exposure is NEAR's price plus the wrapper's integrity — a bridge or custodian sits between this token and the real asset, and bridge-layer failures are where wrapped tokens die. The mcap-vs-liquidity ratio is reasonable; the honest sizing question is the wrapper, not the chain.
FAQ
Which is bigger, MPLX or WNEAR?
By tracked market cap: MPLX (Solana) measures $15.04M and WNEAR (Solana) measures $2.89M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, MPLX or WNEAR?
On the contract checks we publish: MPLX (Solana) grades A and WNEAR (Solana) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have MPLX and WNEAR performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show MPLX at +1.40% and WNEAR at +32.8%.
More comparisons
MPLX vs RYYMPLX vs FKBMPLX vs CRDMPLX vs RDKWNEAR vs RYYWNEAR vs FKBWNEAR vs CRDWNEAR vs RDK
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.