HostMNT vs CRD — price, size and safety, side by side
MNT (Solana) vs CRD (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17 / 2026-09-17T20:24:07.
MNT vs CRD — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07
| MNT | CRD | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.5671 | $2.13K |
| Market cap | $2.55M | — |
| 24h volume | $7.83K | $4.03B |
| Liquidity | $43.38K | $1.99B |
| FDV | $2.55M | — |
| Holders | 671 | — |
| Age (days) | — | 1 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- CRD measures ~45,758× the liquidity of MNT
- CRD measures ~514,530× the 24h volume of MNT
- over the shared window MNT moved −9.21% while CRD moved 0.00%
What the data says
MNT
Mantle's MNT on Solana — the bridged claim on the governance/gas token of the Mantle Ethereum L2 — at mint 4SoQ8UkWfeDH47T56PA53CZCeW4KytYCiU65CwBWoJUt. The September 16, 2026 snapshot shows about $43 thousand of liquidity and roughly 671 holders.
MNT the asset is a real mid-cap L2 token — Mantle runs one of the larger Ethereum rollups, born from the BitDAO treasury, with the token doing gas and governance duty. The Solana version is a bridge claim; the canonical asset is ERC-20 and its real markets are on Mantle/Ethereum/CEXs.
CRD
Four billion dollars is what CRD's venue feed claimed the token traded in a single day — on August 19, 2026, when Cirudu was approximately one day old. Put that figure next to the rest of the same snapshot: about $1.99 billion in claimed liquidity, a recorded market capitalization of zero, and no holder count at all. For scale, four billion dollars of daily turnover is what entire major exchanges do; a nameless day-old Base token reporting it while having no measurable owners is describing something that cannot exist. The parsimonious explanation is reported-figure inflation — trading volume manufactured against the token's own pools so that listing feeds repeat impressive numbers.
This page's honest scope: HostDeFi's EVM snapshot grades market structure from those very venue feeds, which is why the incoherence above is the most valuable output the capture produced. The contract itself — mint powers, owner functions, transfer taxes, honeypot mechanics at 0x95735d3f68d045c942afb9ea1090f6b03150bfab — was not assessed in this snapshot, and with a token in this category, the contract is where the actual answer lives. Run the live scan above; it reads the chain, not the feed.
FAQ
Which is bigger, MNT or CRD?
By tracked market cap: MNT (Solana) measures $2.55M and CRD (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, MNT or CRD?
On the contract checks we publish: MNT (Solana) grades B and CRD (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have MNT and CRD performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show MNT at −9.21% and CRD at 0.00%.
More comparisons
MNT vs RYYMNT vs FKBMNT vs RDKMNT vs CCVCRD vs RYYCRD vs FKBCRD vs RDKCRD vs CCV
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.