HostMNGO vs NOMNOM — price, size and safety, side by side
MNGO (Solana) vs NOMNOM (Solana) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-17.
MNGO vs NOMNOM — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-10-17T03:15:24
| MNGO | NOMNOM | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.03037 | $0.0002032 |
| Market cap | $35.85M | $239.42K |
| 24h volume | $16.05K DEX | $2.14K DEX |
| Liquidity | $62.89K | $62.64K |
| FDV | $35.85M | $239.42K |
| Holders | 13,608 | 10,174 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- MNGO measures ~150× the market cap of NOMNOM
- MNGO measures ~7.5× the 24h volume of NOMNOM
- over the shared window MNGO moved −4.59% while NOMNOM moved −21.9%
What the data says
MNGO
MNGO is Mango Markets' token — the Solana perp/lending DEX that survived one of the most famous exploits in DeFi history (a $114M market-manipulation incident that became a landmark crypto-fraud conviction) and kept operating through the aftermath. The mint MangoCzJ36AjZyKwVj3VnYU4GTonjfVEnJmvvWaxLac is what our scan tracks: $35.9 million market cap, $63 thousand of pool liquidity, 13,608 holders as of October 6, 2026.
The honest read: the exploit is the headline and also the lesson — oracle-manipulable collateral is what let it happen, and "protocol survived a nine-figure manipulation" is a strange kind of track record that cuts both ways. The venue still runs; the token carries the history in its discount.
NOMNOM
NOMNOM on Solana — mint 6ZrYhkwvoYE4QqzpdzJ7htEHwT2u2546EkTNJ7qepump — is a Cookie-Monster-style eating-sound meme — the nomnom_solana handle is live. The October 6, 2026 snapshot reads $239 thousand across a wide 10,174-holder file.
~$21 of cap per wallet on ten thousand wallets is the wide-dust pattern — a meme that spread broadly and left many small bags. ~$1 thousand of daily volume on $63 thousand is a quiet book. Mint and freeze revoked.
FAQ
Which is bigger, MNGO or NOMNOM?
By tracked market cap: MNGO (Solana) measures $35.85M and NOMNOM (Solana) measures $239.42K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, MNGO or NOMNOM?
On the contract checks we publish: MNGO (Solana) grades A and NOMNOM (Solana) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have MNGO and NOMNOM performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-10-17T03:15:24, the measured snapshots show MNGO at −4.59% and NOMNOM at −21.9%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-10-17T03:15:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.