Open app

MIRAI vs CRD — price, size and safety, side by side

MIRAI (Solana) vs CRD (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17 / 2026-09-17T20:24:07.

MIRAIB

$0.0004702
Project MIRAI on Solana
Trade MIRAI
vs

CRDB

$2.13K
Cirudu on Base
Trade CRD

MIRAI vs CRD — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07

100 — shared start
MIRAI −4.65%  ·  CRD 0.00% — both series rebased to 100 at the first measured point in the shared window; not a raw-price chart.
MIRAICRD
Price$0.0004702$2.13K
Market cap$459.03K
24h volume$331.27$4.03B
Liquidity$157.29K$1.99B
FDV$459.03K
Holders22,742
Age (days)1
Safety gradeBB

Where they differ

What the data says

MIRAI

Project MIRAI — MIRAI — a Solana AI-agent token from the agent-framework wave (the project builds around autonomous agent tooling), at mint 5evN2exivZXJfLaA1KhHfiJKWfwH8znqyH36w1SFz89Y. The September 16, 2026 snapshot shows about $157 thousand of liquidity and roughly 22,742 holders.

Agent-framework tokens live or die on whether the tooling gets used — the honest read on the category is that narrative ran far ahead of shipped usage for most of them, and the survivors are the ones still building. MIRAI kept a real community: 22,742 holders is genuine breadth.

Full MIRAI safety read →

CRD

Four billion dollars is what CRD's venue feed claimed the token traded in a single day — on August 19, 2026, when Cirudu was approximately one day old. Put that figure next to the rest of the same snapshot: about $1.99 billion in claimed liquidity, a recorded market capitalization of zero, and no holder count at all. For scale, four billion dollars of daily turnover is what entire major exchanges do; a nameless day-old Base token reporting it while having no measurable owners is describing something that cannot exist. The parsimonious explanation is reported-figure inflation — trading volume manufactured against the token's own pools so that listing feeds repeat impressive numbers.

This page's honest scope: HostDeFi's EVM snapshot grades market structure from those very venue feeds, which is why the incoherence above is the most valuable output the capture produced. The contract itself — mint powers, owner functions, transfer taxes, honeypot mechanics at 0x95735d3f68d045c942afb9ea1090f6b03150bfab — was not assessed in this snapshot, and with a token in this category, the contract is where the actual answer lives. Run the live scan above; it reads the chain, not the feed.

Full CRD safety read →

FAQ

Which is bigger, MIRAI or CRD?

By tracked market cap: MIRAI (Solana) measures $459.03K and CRD (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.

Which is safer, MIRAI or CRD?

On the contract checks we publish: MIRAI (Solana) grades B and CRD (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.

How have MIRAI and CRD performed over the shared window?

Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show MIRAI at −4.65% and CRD at 0.00%.

More comparisons

MIRAI vs RYYMIRAI vs FKBMIRAI vs RDKMIRAI vs CCVCRD vs RYYCRD vs FKBCRD vs RDKCRD vs CCV

The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.

Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.