HostMF vs RDK — price, size and safety, side by side
MF (Solana) vs RDK (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17 / 2026-09-17T20:24:07.
MF vs RDK — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07
| MF | RDK | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.006069 | $2.07K |
| Market cap | $5.92M | — |
| 24h volume | $1.94K | $2.89B |
| Liquidity | $57.92K | $1.74B |
| FDV | $5.92M | — |
| Holders | 9,631 | — |
| Age (days) | — | 1 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- RDK measures ~30,090× the liquidity of MF
- RDK measures ~1,485,788× the 24h volume of MF
- over the shared window MF moved −10.4% while RDK moved 0.00%
What the data says
MF
MF is the token of Moonwalk Fitness — a Solana move-to-earn app where users stake tokens on hitting daily step goals and lose them to the pool when they miss. The mint moonThZEkkTVoNB7v6YVCQiT56JYDZ1oN185ba3WizL is what our scan tracks: $5.9 million market cap, $58 thousand of liquidity and 9,631 holders as of September 16, 2026.
The honest read: fitness-stake apps have a real engagement loop — losing money for skipping steps is a stronger mechanic than most app tokens have — but move-to-earn as a category has a documented boom-bust history (StepN being the cautionary tale). The token's value case is sustained daily-active usage, which is measurable in app stores rather than in the pool.
RDK
Sometimes the read on a token is defined by what is missing, and Rudake is that case. HostDeFi's August 19, 2026 capture of RDK — taken when the token was about one day old — has no holder count, no market capitalization, no mint- or freeze-control assessment, and no identifying history. What it does have is a pair of claims from the listing venue: roughly $1.74 billion in pool liquidity and $2.89 billion in daily volume. When the only two numbers present are the two easiest to fabricate, and every number that is hard to fabricate is absent, the shape of the data is itself the disclosure.
Why those two, specifically? Because screeners and aggregators rank by them. An operator who cycles trades against their own pool manufactures "volume" for the cost of gas; reserve figures arrive via feeds that don't audit what they relay. Holder counts and contract state, by contrast, live on-chain where anyone can check — which is why they are the fields that go missing when the goal is to look large rather than be large.
FAQ
Which is bigger, MF or RDK?
By tracked market cap: MF (Solana) measures $5.92M and RDK (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, MF or RDK?
On the contract checks we publish: MF (Solana) grades A and RDK (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have MF and RDK performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show MF at −10.4% and RDK at 0.00%.
More comparisons
MF vs RYYMF vs FKBMF vs CRDMF vs CCVRDK vs RYYRDK vs FKBRDK vs CRDRDK vs CCV
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.