HostMEBT vs CRV — price, size and safety, side by side
MEBT (Polygon) vs CRV (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.
MEBT vs CRV — normalized performance, 2026-09-27 to 2026-09-27T21:19:38
| MEBT | CRV | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $3.08 | $0.3436 |
| Market cap | $4.23M | $539.21M |
| 24h volume | $117.54K | $633.85K |
| Liquidity | $263.02K | $10.48M |
| FDV | $4.20M | $831.96M |
| Holders | 6,886 | 100,872 |
| Age (days) | 108 | — |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- CRV measures ~127× the market cap of MEBT
- CRV measures ~40× the liquidity of MEBT
- CRV measures ~5.4× the 24h volume of MEBT
- CRV measures ~15× the holder count of MEBT
What the data says
MEBT
MEBT at 0x99d11bb9bc5f1ee15a817934f33643dee41026d5 is a young Polygon asset — 108 days into its record at the September 27, 2026 snapshot — with 6,886 holders sharing a 1.4 million supply. The snapshot carries no market-cap reading; the book's size is what the pools report.
The contract is the locked kind: mint and freeze authority are both revoked, the contract cannot create new supply, and it is not a proxy — the full clean set on a young deployment. The distribution is the counterweight: the ten largest wallets hold 99.8% of supply, an essentially single-bracket book despite the wide holder count. $263.0 thousand of deep tracked depth sees $114.7 thousand of daily volume — a tape that nearly halves the pool daily.
CRV
One thing stands out on CRV, and it's worth knowing up front. As of the 2026-09-27 read, the contract's mint function hasn't been removed, which means the team can still create new supply. Read the rest of the page with that in mind — it's why CRV is at B (75/100) as of 2026-09-27, with real room to improve.
Market-wise, CRV carries $10.48M of on-chain liquidity and 100,872 wallets holding as of 2026-09-27. Set the $10.48M of depth beside roughly $539.21M in market cap and it reads as moderate: comfortable for everyday trades, less so for size that begins to rival the pool itself. A holder base of 100,872 is reassuring too — counts like that are difficult to fake and point to real, spread-out ownership rather than a few concentrated hands. Reassuringly, the wallet that created CRV holds under 5% of supply (<0.01%) as of 2026-09-27 — the deployer hasn't kept an oversized stake to unload.
FAQ
Which is bigger, MEBT or CRV?
By tracked market cap: MEBT (Polygon) measures $4.23M and CRV (Ethereum) measures $539.21M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, MEBT or CRV?
On the contract checks we publish: MEBT (Polygon) grades A and CRV (Ethereum) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have MEBT and CRV performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-27 and 2026-09-27T21:19:38, the measured snapshots show MEBT at 0.00% and CRV at 0.00%.
More comparisons
MEBT vs CLAWNES vs MEBTMEBT vs BEEMEBT vs KITTYUSDTB vs CRVSKY vs CRVMEW vs CRVCRV vs SUSDAI
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-27→2026-09-27T21:19:38; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.