HostMCDX vs RDK — price, size and safety, side by side
MCDX (Solana) vs RDK (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17 / 2026-09-17T20:24:07.
MCDX vs RDK — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07
| MCDX | RDK | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $249.35 | $2.07K |
| Market cap | $13.85M | — |
| 24h volume | $2.48M | $2.89B |
| Liquidity | $415.41K | $1.74B |
| FDV | $13.85M | — |
| Holders | 18,745 | — |
| Age (days) | — | 1 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- RDK measures ~4,195× the liquidity of MCDX
- RDK measures ~1,163× the 24h volume of MCDX
What the data says
MCDX
MCDX is the xStock for McDonald's — Backed Finance's tokenized wrapper for the fast-food bellwether. The mint XsqE9cRRpzxcGKDXj1BJ7Xmg4GRhZoyY1KpmGSxAWT2 is what our scan tracks: $13.8 million market cap, $415 thousand of liquidity and 18,745 holders as of September 16, 2026 — the best liquidity-to-cap ratio in the whole xStock line.
The underlying is a defensive low-beta name, and the pool depth here actually matches the cap — a combination that makes MCDX the most tradable xStock in the corpus despite being one of the smaller ones. Family caveats hold: Backed custody under the hood, after-hours quoting, and dividends are part of MCD's total return — confirm how the issuer passes them through.
RDK
Sometimes the read on a token is defined by what is missing, and Rudake is that case. HostDeFi's August 19, 2026 capture of RDK — taken when the token was about one day old — has no holder count, no market capitalization, no mint- or freeze-control assessment, and no identifying history. What it does have is a pair of claims from the listing venue: roughly $1.74 billion in pool liquidity and $2.89 billion in daily volume. When the only two numbers present are the two easiest to fabricate, and every number that is hard to fabricate is absent, the shape of the data is itself the disclosure.
Why those two, specifically? Because screeners and aggregators rank by them. An operator who cycles trades against their own pool manufactures "volume" for the cost of gas; reserve figures arrive via feeds that don't audit what they relay. Holder counts and contract state, by contrast, live on-chain where anyone can check — which is why they are the fields that go missing when the goal is to look large rather than be large.
FAQ
Which is bigger, MCDX or RDK?
By tracked market cap: MCDX (Solana) measures $13.85M and RDK (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, MCDX or RDK?
On the contract checks we publish: MCDX (Solana) grades A and RDK (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have MCDX and RDK performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show MCDX at −1.69% and RDK at 0.00%.
More comparisons
MCDX vs RYYMCDX vs FKBMCDX vs CRDMCDX vs CCVRDK vs RYYRDK vs FKBRDK vs CRDRDK vs CCV
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.