HostLONG vs ZEN — price, size and safety, side by side
LONG (Base) vs ZEN (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-05 / 2026-10-16.
LONG vs ZEN — normalized performance, 2026-09-14 to 2026-10-05
| LONG | ZEN | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.0000003079 | $6.12 |
| Market cap | $232.77K | $117.08M |
| 24h volume | $36.60M DEX | $2.34M DEX |
| Liquidity | $1.83M | $1.75M |
| FDV | $232.77K | $133.57M |
| Holders | 6,140 | 104,768 |
| Age (days) | 0 | 443 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- ZEN measures ~503× the market cap of LONG
- LONG measures ~16× the 24h volume of ZEN
- ZEN measures ~17× the holder count of LONG
- over the shared window LONG moved −99.7% while ZEN moved −11.0%
What the data says
LONG
This is the second LONG row on Base — the shallower sibling at 0x4a72d6f1fd7582f1246ce9e5b248083d938b2b07, where our October 6, 2026 snapshot reads $1.8 million of tracked pool liquidity against the deeper row's ~$5 million.
The honest note is the same one every sibling pair earns: same ticker, different contract, and the depth split says the market mostly chose the other one — which doesn't make this one illegitimate, just the less-liquid venue for the name. The mint above is the identity this page's figures describe.
ZEN
ZEN is Horizen's token — a veteran privacy-chain project that migrated its ecosystem onto a Base-settled architecture after years as a standalone chain. The contract 0xf43eb8de897fbc7f2502483b2bef7bb9ea179229 is the Base deployment our scan tracks, at $1.7 million of pool liquidity as of October 9, 2026.
The honest read: ZEN is a legacy-network bet in a new wrapper — the zero-knowledge lineage and once-large validator base are real, and so is the migration risk: projects that replatform are simultaneously conceding the old home couldn't hold them and asking the new one to re-rate them. Watch whether Base-era usage actually follows the token.
FAQ
Which is bigger, LONG or ZEN?
By tracked market cap: LONG (Base) measures $232.77K and ZEN (Base) measures $117.08M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, LONG or ZEN?
On the contract checks we publish: LONG (Base) grades A and ZEN (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have LONG and ZEN performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-14 and 2026-10-05, the measured snapshots show LONG at −99.7% and ZEN at −11.0%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-14→2026-10-05; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.