HostLIT vs FET — price, size and safety, side by side
LIT (Ethereum) vs FET (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.
LIT vs FET — normalized performance, 2026-09-27 to 2026-09-27T21:19:38
| LIT | FET | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $4.70 | $0.2389 |
| Market cap | $1.26B | $552.32M |
| 24h volume | $2.40M | $242.69K |
| Liquidity | $2.00M | $1.89M |
| FDV | $4.94B | $648.58M |
| Holders | 9,530 | 165,380 |
| Age (days) | 246 | — |
| Safety grade | A | D |
Where they differ
- LIT measures ~2.3× the market cap of FET
- LIT measures ~9.9× the 24h volume of FET
- FET measures ~17× the holder count of LIT
What the data says
LIT
LIT is Lighter's token — the equity of one of the higher-volume perpetual DEXes running, a zk-rollup venue that settles Ethereum-grade while quoting like a centralized exchange. The contract 0x232ce3bd40fcd6f80f3d55a522d03f25df784ee2 is the deployment our scan tracks, at $2.0 million of pool liquidity as of September 26, 2026.
The honest read: the venue is real — Lighter has sat near the top of perp-DEX volume rankings — and the question is the standard one for fresh exchange tokens: how much of the venue's economics actually accrue to the token, and what the post-airdrop float looks like as unlocks land. Volume is the claim; the token's claim on it is what to verify.
FET
One thing stands out on FET, and it's worth knowing up front. As of the 2026-09-27 read, the contract's mint and freeze levers hasn't been removed, leaving the deployer able to create new supply or freeze transfers for now. That's what's holding the score at 49/100 for now; it's a good thing to keep an eye on, and the grade would rise if it's removed.
Looking at the market data, FET shows $1.89M of on-chain liquidity and 165,380 holders as of 2026-09-27. The number worth sitting with is that $1.89M of depth against a market cap of about $552.32M — a thin pool for a token this size, which means a position that feels small to you can still be large for the pool: FET reprices on relatively little flow, and a sizable exit will slip. A holder base of 165,380 is reassuring too — counts like that are difficult to fake and point to real, spread-out ownership rather than a few concentrated hands. Reassuringly, the wallet that created FET holds under 5% of supply (<0.01%) as of 2026-09-27 — the deployer hasn't kept an oversized stake to unload.
FAQ
Which is bigger, LIT or FET?
By tracked market cap: LIT (Ethereum) measures $1.26B and FET (Ethereum) measures $552.32M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, LIT or FET?
On the contract checks we publish: LIT (Ethereum) grades A and FET (Ethereum) grades D. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have LIT and FET performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-27 and 2026-09-27T21:19:38, the measured snapshots show LIT at 0.00% and FET at 0.00%.
More comparisons
LIT vs 牛来BC vs LITLIT vs SOLOLIT vs SPYBNVDAC vs FETMON vs FETGITLAWB vs FETTROLL vs FET
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-27→2026-09-27T21:19:38; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.