HostLION vs MERY — price, size and safety, side by side
LION (Cronos) vs MERY (Cronos) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-17.
LION vs MERY — normalized performance, 2026-10-09 to 2026-10-17T03:15:24
| LION | MERY | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.001255 | $0.000002478 |
| Market cap | $42.48M | $960.88K |
| 24h volume | $5.52K DEX | $57.54K DEX |
| Liquidity | $1.07M | $153.45K |
| FDV | $138.47M | $960.29K |
| Holders | 10,332 | 16,423 |
| Age (days) | 585 | 925 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- LION measures ~44× the market cap of MERY
- LION measures ~7.0× the liquidity of MERY
- MERY measures ~10× the 24h volume of LION
- MERY measures ~1.6× the holder count of LION
- over the shared window LION moved −9.33% while MERY moved +8.50%
What the data says
LION
LION gets the fundamentals right where it counts most: the contract itself. The contract cannot mint new supply, so the float can't be diluted, and it can't pause transfers or blacklist wallets either, so your tokens stay yours to move and sell. Neither lever existing is the main reason LION's 100/100 comes down to market factors, not contract ones (2026-10-09).
Looking at the market data, LION shows $1.07M of on-chain liquidity, a holder base of 10,332 and an established 585-day history as of 2026-10-09. Against a market cap of about $42.48M, the $1.07M pool is workable rather than deep — fine for ordinary size to move in and out, though a larger position would start to feel the pool's edges. The 10,332-wallet base is a reasonable spread of ownership, though a headline count doesn't show whether a few wallets dominate — the concentration read on this page speaks to that. Reassuringly, the wallet that created LION holds under 5% of supply (<0.01%) as of 2026-10-09 — the deployer hasn't kept an oversized stake to unload.
MERY
On the two things that matter most in a token contract, MERY looks great. With minting impossible at the contract level, the supply stays a firm ceiling, and no wallet can be blacklisted either, so no one can hold your tokens in place. It's a reassuring starting point: 92/100 as of 2026-10-09, with the structural risks already off the table.
Here's where MERY stands today: $153.45K of on-chain liquidity, a holder base of 16,423 and an established record at 925 days as of 2026-10-09. Against roughly $960.88K in market cap, the $153.45K of liquidity is genuinely healthy: deep enough that ordinary trades clear cleanly, which is exactly what you want to see. The 16,423-wallet base is a reasonable spread of ownership, though a headline count doesn't show whether a few wallets dominate — the concentration read on this page speaks to that. Reassuringly, the wallet that created MERY holds under 5% of supply (0.12%) as of 2026-10-09 — the deployer hasn't kept an oversized stake to unload.
FAQ
Which is bigger, LION or MERY?
By tracked market cap: LION (Cronos) measures $42.48M and MERY (Cronos) measures $960.88K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, LION or MERY?
On the contract checks we publish: LION (Cronos) grades A and MERY (Cronos) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have LION and MERY performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-09 and 2026-10-17T03:15:24, the measured snapshots show LION at −9.33% and MERY at +8.50%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-09→2026-10-17T03:15:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.