HostLINK vs AURA — price, size and safety, side by side
LINK (Ethereum) vs AURA (Polygon) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-15.
LINK vs AURA — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-10-15T21:43:45
| LINK | AURA | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $12.27 | $0.2737 |
| Market cap | $9.53B | — |
| 24h volume | $1.95M DEX | $27.48K DEX |
| Liquidity | $19.94M | $865.15K |
| FDV | $12.74B | $3.43M |
| Holders | 922,570 | 2,723 |
| Age (days) | 1,745 | 103 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- LINK measures ~23× the liquidity of AURA
- LINK measures ~71× the 24h volume of AURA
- LINK measures ~339× the holder count of AURA
- over the shared window LINK moved −3.35% while AURA moved −48.2%
What the data says
LINK
LINK is Chainlink's token — the asset that pays the oracle network most of DeFi runs on, making it one of the few crypto tokens tied to infrastructure the market actually uses every block. The deployment 0x514910771af9ca656af840dff83e8264ecf986ca is the canonical mint; our October 9, 2026 snapshot reads $19.9 million of tracked pool liquidity on this pair set — a fraction of a float spread across every venue that lists it.
The honest shape: LINK's value thesis is payment for oracle services plus stake in the network's security model, so it carries a real-usage floor most tokens lack — and a valuation that has always run ahead of the fees the network actually collects. It is infrastructure exposure, not a cashflow claim, and the gap between "most-used oracle" and "token captures that usage" is the open question its holders are betting on.
AURA
AURA — Auralith — is an 88-day-old Polygon token at 0xd9d12f43918363cea1c0b62d16f1f81b8eae91e0, priced at a $3.4 million market cap on the October 9, 2026 snapshot.
The venue side is the healthiest in this batch relative to size: $865 thousand of tracked pool liquidity is deep for a $4.5M cap — a quarter of the valuation sits in the exit book. What isn't measured matters as much: contract controls weren't evaluated in this snapshot and holder distribution wasn't resolved, so the structural questions stay open.
FAQ
Which is bigger, LINK or AURA?
By tracked market cap: LINK (Ethereum) measures $9.53B and AURA (Polygon) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, LINK or AURA?
On the contract checks we publish: LINK (Ethereum) grades A and AURA (Polygon) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have LINK and AURA performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-10-15T21:43:45, the measured snapshots show LINK at −3.35% and AURA at −48.2%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-10-15T21:43:45; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.