HostLINK.E vs UST — price, size and safety, side by side
LINK.E (Avalanche) vs UST (Avalanche) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.
LINK.E vs UST — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-27T21:19:38
| LINK.E | UST | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $14.26 | $0.005974 |
| Market cap | $10.67B | $79.67K |
| 24h volume | $16.06K | $2.06K |
| Liquidity | $91.58K | $68.14K |
| FDV | $5.21M | $88.12K |
| Holders | 13,081 | 7,230 |
| Age (days) | 1,121 | 1,705 |
| Safety grade | C | C |
Where they differ
- LINK.E measures ~133,876× the market cap of UST
- LINK.E measures ~7.8× the 24h volume of UST
- LINK.E measures ~1.8× the holder count of UST
- over the shared window LINK.E moved +9.81% while UST moved +2.59%
What the data says
LINK.E
LINK.E at 0x5947bb275c521040051d82396192181b413227a3 is the legacy Avalanche Bridge deployment of Chainlink's token — the ".e" suffix marking the older bridge's claim — 1,121 days into its record at the September 27, 2026 snapshot. The asset-wide $10.7 billion market cap dwarfs the $5.2 million fully-diluted figure priced on 365.7 thousand local units.
The local book is thin for the headline: $91.6 thousand of tracked depth on $72.6 thousand of 24-hour volume. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
UST
UST on Avalanche at 0x260bbf5698121eb85e7a74f2e45e16ce762ebe11 — "Axelar Wrapped UST" — is a remnant of the TerraUSD collapse carried over a bridge: what was once the dollar-pegged stablecoin now trades around $0.006, kept alive as a speculative claim on nothing in particular.
At the September 27, 2026 snapshot the book reads like an artifact rather than a market: $68 thousand of liquidity against a $80 thousand cap — a pool bigger than the cap, because the price already found its floor — across 1,705 days of history and a few thousand dollars of daily volume. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot, so the wrapper's levers are unverified.
FAQ
Which is bigger, LINK.E or UST?
By tracked market cap: LINK.E (Avalanche) measures $10.67B and UST (Avalanche) measures $79.67K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, LINK.E or UST?
On the contract checks we publish: LINK.E (Avalanche) grades C and UST (Avalanche) grades C. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have LINK.E and UST performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-27T21:19:38, the measured snapshots show LINK.E at +9.81% and UST at +2.59%.
More comparisons
PUNCH vs LINK.EZAUTH vs LINK.ETRCH1 vs LINK.EBUCKAZOIDS vs LINK.EKURUMI vs USTUST vs XAUT0UST vs PAXUST vs CLUDE
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-27T21:19:38; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.