HostLINK.E vs HEFE — price, size and safety, side by side
LINK.E (Avalanche) vs HEFE (Avalanche) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-16 / 2026-10-16.
LINK.E vs HEFE — normalized performance, 2026-10-06 to 2026-10-16T21:15:32
| LINK.E | HEFE | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $12.39 | $0.002235 |
| Market cap | $9.64B | $1.43M |
| 24h volume | $7.12K DEX | $10.86K DEX |
| Liquidity | $89.47K | $86.50K |
| FDV | $4.65M | $1.43M |
| Holders | 13,087 | 5,399 |
| Age (days) | 1,121 | 910 |
| Safety grade | C | B |
Where they differ
- LINK.E measures ~6,733× the market cap of HEFE
- HEFE measures ~1.5× the 24h volume of LINK.E
- LINK.E measures ~2.4× the holder count of HEFE
- over the shared window LINK.E moved −12.1% while HEFE moved −30.6%
What the data says
LINK.E
LINK.E at 0x5947bb275c521040051d82396192181b413227a3 is the legacy Avalanche Bridge deployment of Chainlink's token — the ".e" suffix marking the older bridge's claim — 1,121 days into its record at the October 9, 2026 snapshot. The asset-wide $9.6 billion market cap dwarfs the $4.7 million fully-diluted figure priced on 365.7 thousand local units.
The local book is thin for the headline: $89.5 thousand of tracked depth on $72.6 thousand of 24-hour volume. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
HEFE
Where a lot of tokens leave a door open, HEFE has closed both. The contract holds no mint power, so the supply stays honest and predictable, and it can't stop a sale either, so selling is always your call. That's exactly the setup you want to see, and it's why HEFE earns a B (78/100) on the contract read as of 2026-10-09 — from here, it's really just the market to weigh.
Looking at the market data, HEFE shows a $86.50K pool, a holder base of 5,399 and 910 days old as of 2026-10-09. Against roughly $1.43M in market cap, the $86.50K of liquidity is genuinely healthy: deep enough that ordinary trades clear cleanly, which is exactly what you want to see. A 5,399-holder base is a fair start, but distribution matters more than the count — check how much sits in the largest wallets before leaning on it. The creator's own position is small — <0.01% of supply as of 2026-10-09, comfortably under the 5% line the scanners flag — which is what you want to see.
FAQ
Which is bigger, LINK.E or HEFE?
By tracked market cap: LINK.E (Avalanche) measures $9.64B and HEFE (Avalanche) measures $1.43M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, LINK.E or HEFE?
On the contract checks we publish: LINK.E (Avalanche) grades C and HEFE (Avalanche) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have LINK.E and HEFE performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-06 and 2026-10-16T21:15:32, the measured snapshots show LINK.E at −12.1% and HEFE at −30.6%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-06→2026-10-16T21:15:32; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.