HostLBTC vs SUSHI — price, size and safety, side by side
LBTC (Solana) vs SUSHI (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-16.
LBTC vs SUSHI — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-10-16T21:15:32
| LBTC | SUSHI | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $81.67K | $0.2329 |
| Market cap | $8.61M | $65.44M |
| 24h volume | $25.53K DEX | $60.61K DEX |
| Liquidity | $3.36M | $759.98K |
| FDV | $8.61M | $66.53M |
| Holders | 472 | — |
| Age (days) | — | 1,042 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- SUSHI measures ~7.6× the market cap of LBTC
- LBTC measures ~4.4× the liquidity of SUSHI
- SUSHI measures ~2.4× the 24h volume of LBTC
- over the shared window LBTC moved +2.70% while SUSHI moved −5.51%
What the data says
LBTC
LBTC is Lombard's staked Bitcoin — the liquid-staking token that puts BTC to work in Babylon's staking layer while circulating as a DeFi-usable claim, one of the "productive BTC" class that grew out of Babylon's launch. The mint LBTCgU4b3wsFKsPwBn1rRZDx5DoFutM6RPiEt1TPDsY is the Solana deployment; our October 6, 2026 snapshot reads $3.4 million of tracked pool liquidity and grades it A.
The honest mechanics: LBTC is a claim on BTC that's been restaked into Babylon's security model — the yield is Babylon's protocol paying for its security budget, which means the return is emissions-shaped (real but endogenous to the system) rather than external revenue. The custody chain is Lombard's consortium model; on Solana, add the bridge that carried it here.
SUSHI
SUSHI is SushiSwap's token — the exchange that famously vampire-attacked Uniswap's liquidity in 2020 and has run as a multichain DEX brand ever since. The contract 0x6b3595068778dd592e39a122f4f5a5cf09c90fe2 is the canonical mainnet deployment; our October 9, 2026 read shows $760 thousand of tracked pool liquidity at a $0.25 handle.
The honest read: SUSHI is a legacy-major trading a long way below its peak — the protocol still ships (aggregator routing, the v4 work, a broad chain footprint), and xSUSHI staking still routes a share of venue fees, but the token's valuation is a bet that a crowded DEX market leaves room for a fifth-generation contender. The brand is the asset and the ceiling.
FAQ
Which is bigger, LBTC or SUSHI?
By tracked market cap: LBTC (Solana) measures $8.61M and SUSHI (Ethereum) measures $65.44M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, LBTC or SUSHI?
On the contract checks we publish: LBTC (Solana) grades A and SUSHI (Ethereum) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have LBTC and SUSHI performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-10-16T21:15:32, the measured snapshots show LBTC at +2.70% and SUSHI at −5.51%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-10-16T21:15:32; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.