HostLBGT vs OHM — price, size and safety, side by side
LBGT (Berachain) vs OHM (Berachain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-17.
LBGT vs OHM — normalized performance, 2026-10-09 to 2026-10-17T03:15:24
| LBGT | OHM | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.1906 | $19 |
| Market cap | $34.86K | $284.11M |
| 24h volume | $1.41K DEX | $19.57 DEX |
| Liquidity | $6.10K | $598.54 |
| FDV | $34.86K | $1.34M |
| Holders | 16,141 | 6,902 |
| Age (days) | 591 | 605 |
| Safety grade | D | C |
Where they differ
- OHM measures ~8,149× the market cap of LBGT
- LBGT measures ~10× the liquidity of OHM
- LBGT measures ~72× the 24h volume of OHM
- LBGT measures ~2.3× the holder count of OHM
- over the shared window LBGT moved +13.1% while OHM moved +0.04%
What the data says
LBGT
The most important thing to know about LBGT is its authority setup. Right now LBGT's contract keeps its mint function (2026-10-09 snapshot), which means the team can still create new supply. Read the rest of the page with that in mind — it's why LBGT is at D (40/100) as of 2026-10-09, with real room to improve.
On the market side, LBGT brings deep liquidity of $6.10K, 16,141 wallets holding and an established record at 591 days as of 2026-10-09. Encouragingly, that $6.10K pool is deep relative to a market cap of about $34.86K — the kind of ratio that lets real size move in and out without much slippage. The 16,141-wallet base is a reasonable spread of ownership, though a headline count doesn't show whether a few wallets dominate — the concentration read on this page speaks to that. Reassuringly, the wallet that created LBGT holds under 5% of supply (<0.01%) as of 2026-10-09 — the deployer hasn't kept an oversized stake to unload.
OHM
OHM has one open item that shapes the whole read, so let's start there. Right now OHM's contract keeps its mint function (2026-10-09 snapshot), so whoever holds it can create new supply at any point. Until that changes, OHM stays around 60/100 — worth watching, and an easy win for the project if they remove it.
On liquidity and holders, OHM shows thin liquidity of $599, 6,902 holders and an established record at 605 days as of 2026-10-09. Set the $599 pool against roughly $284.11M in market cap and the picture sharpens — depth is shallow for the size, so trades move the price more than the chart suggests and getting out cleanly takes care. The 6,902-wallet base is a reasonable spread of ownership, though a headline count doesn't show whether a few wallets dominate — the concentration read on this page speaks to that. On concentration, the deployer wallet holds just <0.01% of OHM as of 2026-10-09, so the person who launched it isn't sitting on a dominant share.
FAQ
Which is bigger, LBGT or OHM?
By tracked market cap: LBGT (Berachain) measures $34.86K and OHM (Berachain) measures $284.11M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, LBGT or OHM?
On the contract checks we publish: LBGT (Berachain) grades D and OHM (Berachain) grades C. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have LBGT and OHM performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-09 and 2026-10-17T03:15:24, the measured snapshots show LBGT at +13.1% and OHM at +0.04%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-09→2026-10-17T03:15:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.