HostLBGT vs BM — price, size and safety, side by side
LBGT (Berachain) vs BM (Berachain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-17.
LBGT vs BM — normalized performance, 2026-10-09 to 2026-10-17T03:15:24
| LBGT | BM | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.1906 | $0.000009931 |
| Market cap | $34.86K | $11.31K |
| 24h volume | $1.41K DEX | $31.35 DEX |
| Liquidity | $6.10K | $1.86K |
| FDV | $34.86K | $11.31K |
| Holders | 16,141 | 13,286 |
| Age (days) | 591 | 610 |
| Safety grade | D | A |
Where they differ
- LBGT measures ~3.1× the market cap of BM
- LBGT measures ~3.3× the liquidity of BM
- LBGT measures ~45× the 24h volume of BM
- over the shared window LBGT moved +13.1% while BM moved −12.2%
What the data says
LBGT
The most important thing to know about LBGT is its authority setup. Right now LBGT's contract keeps its mint function (2026-10-09 snapshot), which means the team can still create new supply. Read the rest of the page with that in mind — it's why LBGT is at D (40/100) as of 2026-10-09, with real room to improve.
On the market side, LBGT brings deep liquidity of $6.10K, 16,141 wallets holding and an established record at 591 days as of 2026-10-09. Encouragingly, that $6.10K pool is deep relative to a market cap of about $34.86K — the kind of ratio that lets real size move in and out without much slippage. The 16,141-wallet base is a reasonable spread of ownership, though a headline count doesn't show whether a few wallets dominate — the concentration read on this page speaks to that. Reassuringly, the wallet that created LBGT holds under 5% of supply (<0.01%) as of 2026-10-09 — the deployer hasn't kept an oversized stake to unload.
BM
The best news on BM is the part risky tokens usually get wrong — its contract. The contract holds no mint power, so the supply stays honest and predictable, and it can't freeze or block transfers, keeping your ability to sell fully open. That's why BM sits comfortably at 85/100 as of 2026-10-09 — the pitfalls that sink most tokens simply aren't here.
Looking at the market data, BM shows deep liquidity of $1.86K, 13,286 wallets holding and an established 610-day history as of 2026-10-09. The $1.86K pool stands up well to a ~$11.31K cap — depth like that means BM absorbs normal flow without the price lurching. A 13,286-holder base is a fair start, but distribution matters more than the count — check how much sits in the largest wallets before leaning on it. The creator's own position is small — <0.01% of supply as of 2026-10-09, comfortably under the 5% line the scanners flag — which is what you want to see.
FAQ
Which is bigger, LBGT or BM?
By tracked market cap: LBGT (Berachain) measures $34.86K and BM (Berachain) measures $11.31K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, LBGT or BM?
On the contract checks we publish: LBGT (Berachain) grades D and BM (Berachain) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have LBGT and BM performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-09 and 2026-10-17T03:15:24, the measured snapshots show LBGT at +13.1% and BM at −12.2%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-09→2026-10-17T03:15:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.