HostKDK vs NECT — price, size and safety, side by side
KDK (Berachain) vs NECT (Berachain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-17.
KDK vs NECT — normalized performance, 2026-10-09 to 2026-10-17T03:15:24
| KDK | NECT | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.09009 | $0.9985 |
| Market cap | $1.38M | $4.44M |
| 24h volume | $4.95K DEX | $16.86K DEX |
| Liquidity | $232.65K | $55.68K |
| FDV | $9.35M | $267.23K |
| Holders | 5,631 | 14,704 |
| Age (days) | 296 | 358 |
| Safety grade | A | E |
Where they differ
- NECT measures ~3.2× the market cap of KDK
- KDK measures ~4.2× the liquidity of NECT
- NECT measures ~3.4× the 24h volume of KDK
- NECT measures ~2.6× the holder count of KDK
- over the shared window KDK moved −3.65% while NECT moved +6.25%
What the data says
KDK
The best news on KDK is the part risky tokens usually get wrong — its contract. The contract cannot mint new supply, so the float can't be diluted, and the contract can't pause or block transfers, leaving you free to trade on your own terms. Neither lever existing is the main reason KDK's 92/100 comes down to market factors, not contract ones (2026-10-09).
Market-wise, KDK carries $232.65K of on-chain liquidity, a holder base of 5,631 and a maturing record at 296 days as of 2026-10-09. Against roughly $1.38M in market cap, the $232.65K of liquidity is genuinely healthy: deep enough that ordinary trades clear cleanly, which is exactly what you want to see. A 5,631-holder base is a fair start, but distribution matters more than the count — check how much sits in the largest wallets before leaning on it. Reassuringly, the wallet that created KDK holds under 5% of supply (<0.01%) as of 2026-10-09 — the deployer hasn't kept an oversized stake to unload.
NECT
The most important thing to know about NECT is its authority setup. Right now NECT's contract keeps its mint and freeze levers (2026-10-09 snapshot), which means the team can still create new supply or freeze transfers. It's the main reason the read sits at 21/100 (grade E) today — and the clearest path to a higher grade is simply removing it.
Market-wise, NECT carries workable liquidity of $55.68K, 14,704 holders and a maturing record at 358 days as of 2026-10-09. The $55.68K pool against a ~$4.44M cap is a middling ratio — enough for typical trades to clear, but worth respecting if you're trading size. 14,704 holders is a decent base; just remember the number alone doesn't reveal how much the top wallets control, so weigh it with the concentration figure. On concentration, the deployer wallet holds just <0.01% of NECT as of 2026-10-09, so the person who launched it isn't sitting on a dominant share.
FAQ
Which is bigger, KDK or NECT?
By tracked market cap: KDK (Berachain) measures $1.38M and NECT (Berachain) measures $4.44M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, KDK or NECT?
On the contract checks we publish: KDK (Berachain) grades A and NECT (Berachain) grades E. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have KDK and NECT performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-09 and 2026-10-17T03:15:24, the measured snapshots show KDK at −3.65% and NECT at +6.25%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-09→2026-10-17T03:15:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.