HostKDK vs IBERA — price, size and safety, side by side
KDK (Berachain) vs IBERA (Berachain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-17.
KDK vs IBERA — normalized performance, 2026-10-09 to 2026-10-17T03:15:24
| KDK | IBERA | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.09009 | $0.1959 |
| Market cap | $1.38M | $17.52M |
| 24h volume | $4.95K DEX | $3.02K DEX |
| Liquidity | $232.65K | $42.63K |
| FDV | $9.35M | $17.52M |
| Holders | 5,631 | 35,930 |
| Age (days) | 296 | 607 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- IBERA measures ~13× the market cap of KDK
- KDK measures ~5.5× the liquidity of IBERA
- KDK measures ~1.6× the 24h volume of IBERA
- IBERA measures ~6.4× the holder count of KDK
- over the shared window KDK moved −3.65% while IBERA moved −11.4%
What the data says
KDK
The best news on KDK is the part risky tokens usually get wrong — its contract. The contract cannot mint new supply, so the float can't be diluted, and the contract can't pause or block transfers, leaving you free to trade on your own terms. Neither lever existing is the main reason KDK's 92/100 comes down to market factors, not contract ones (2026-10-09).
Market-wise, KDK carries $232.65K of on-chain liquidity, a holder base of 5,631 and a maturing record at 296 days as of 2026-10-09. Against roughly $1.38M in market cap, the $232.65K of liquidity is genuinely healthy: deep enough that ordinary trades clear cleanly, which is exactly what you want to see. A 5,631-holder base is a fair start, but distribution matters more than the count — check how much sits in the largest wallets before leaning on it. Reassuringly, the wallet that created KDK holds under 5% of supply (<0.01%) as of 2026-10-09 — the deployer hasn't kept an oversized stake to unload.
IBERA
There's a small gap on this page — IBERA's contract flags weren't fully confirmed as of 2026-10-09. So rather than assume anything either way, it's worth a direct check, and a quick live scan will confirm the current state for you.
Looking at the market data, IBERA shows a $42.63K pool, a holder base of 35,930 and an established record at 607 days as of 2026-10-09. The number worth sitting with is that $42.63K of depth against a market cap of about $17.52M — a thin pool for a token this size, which means a position that feels small to you can still be large for the pool: IBERA reprices on relatively little flow, and a sizable exit will slip. 35,930 holders is a decent base; just remember the number alone doesn't reveal how much the top wallets control, so weigh it with the concentration figure. On concentration, the deployer wallet holds just <0.01% of IBERA as of 2026-10-09, so the person who launched it isn't sitting on a dominant share.
FAQ
Which is bigger, KDK or IBERA?
By tracked market cap: KDK (Berachain) measures $1.38M and IBERA (Berachain) measures $17.52M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, KDK or IBERA?
On the contract checks we publish: KDK (Berachain) grades A and IBERA (Berachain) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have KDK and IBERA performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-09 and 2026-10-17T03:15:24, the measured snapshots show KDK at −3.65% and IBERA at −11.4%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-09→2026-10-17T03:15:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.