HostJUPSOL vs JUICED — price, size and safety, side by side
JUPSOL (Solana) vs JUICED (Solana) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-17.
JUPSOL vs JUICED — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-10-17T03:15:24
| JUPSOL | JUICED | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $126.71 | $1.04 |
| Market cap | $624.49M | $51.57M |
| 24h volume | $2.98M DEX | $2.11M DEX |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| FDV | $624.49M | $51.57M |
| Holders | 33,050 | 3,660 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- JUPSOL measures ~12× the market cap of JUICED
- JUPSOL measures ~9.0× the holder count of JUICED
What the data says
JUPSOL
JupSOL exists because Jupiter wanted its own validator to win, and offered stakers a clean bribe to help: zero fees. Stake SOL through Jupiter and the resulting jupSOL — mint jupSoLaHXQiZZTSfEWMTRRgpnyFm8f6sZdosWBjx93v — accrues validator rewards with Jupiter taking no cut, plus the MEV earnings of the Jupiter validator the stake supports. The pitch worked: the October 6, 2026 snapshot shows roughly $624.5 million staked across 33,050 holders, making it one of the largest single-validator stake pools on the chain.
"Single-validator" is the phrase to sit with. Most large LSTs spread stake across dozens or hundreds of validators; jupSOL concentrates it on Jupiter's. For the holder, the practical risks barely change — delegated stake can't be stolen by a validator, and downtime costs missed rewards rather than principal — but at network scale, popular single-validator pools nudge Solana's stake toward concentration, a trade-off the ecosystem debates in good faith. You get the best economics on the chain; the chain gets a slightly heavier validator.
JUICED
JUICED is the page in this cohort where honesty about limits matters most, so it leads with them: beyond the name its metadata carries, this token doesn't come with a public story our read can verify, and this page won't invent one. What the chain shows at mint 7GxATsNMnaC88vdwd2t3mwrFuQwwGvmYPrUQ4D6FotXk, per HostDeFi's October 6, 2026 snapshot: roughly $51.6 million of represented value held by 3,660 wallets, a freeze authority that reads revoked, and the value-equals-pool signature that characterizes receipt tokens — staking or yield-pool shares whose worth tracks deposits — rather than free-floating traded assets.
That signature shapes how to read everything else. A receipt token's supply expands and contracts with its pool by design, so "can supply grow?" has the same answer as for every liquid-staking token this site grades: yes, mechanically, as the product operating — with the freeze-authority check (passed here) being the one that actually protects holders. The nearly four thousand wallets holding it imply a real user base for whatever the underlying product is, not a treasury parked in a wrapper.
FAQ
Which is bigger, JUPSOL or JUICED?
By tracked market cap: JUPSOL (Solana) measures $624.49M and JUICED (Solana) measures $51.57M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, JUPSOL or JUICED?
On the contract checks we publish: JUPSOL (Solana) grades A and JUICED (Solana) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have JUPSOL and JUICED performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-10-17T03:15:24, the measured snapshots show JUPSOL at +1.98% and JUICED at +0.55%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-10-17T03:15:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.