HostJUP vs ONYC — price, size and safety, side by side
JUP (Solana) vs ONYC (Solana) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-17.
JUP vs ONYC — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-10-17T00:15:22
| JUP | ONYC | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.3051 | $1.15 |
| Market cap | $1.15B | $105.90M |
| 24h volume | $16.48M DEX | $1.93M DEX |
| Liquidity | $5.68M | $5.10M |
| FDV | $2.38B | $296.16M |
| Holders | 838,886 | 8,790 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- JUP measures ~11× the market cap of ONYC
- JUP measures ~8.5× the 24h volume of ONYC
- JUP measures ~95× the holder count of ONYC
- over the shared window JUP moved +25.2% while ONYC moved +1.02%
What the data says
JUP
JUP is the governance token of Jupiter, the aggregator that routes the majority of Solana's swap volume — including, full disclosure, many of the swaps on this site. That makes it one of the few large Solana tokens whose underlying "business" is directly observable on-chain: every day's routed volume is public, and the token's relevance rises and falls with it. As of the October 6, 2026 snapshot, JUP carries roughly $1.1 billion of market capitalization across 838,886 holders at mint JUPyiwrYJFskUPiHa7hkeR8VUtAeFoSYbKedZNsDvCN.
The structural read is clean: mint authority revoked, freeze authority revoked. No one can inflate the supply by fiat and no one can lock a holder's tokens — the two failure modes that account for most of the wreckage this site catalogues. Distribution is genuinely broad; an 800-thousand-wallet base came from one of the largest airdrop programs in Solana's history, which spread ownership widely but also created recurring, scheduled moments of sell pressure as later distribution rounds unlocked. Supply events like that are public calendar items, not hidden risks, but they are worth knowing about before reading any chart move as organic.
ONYC
ONYC is OnRe's tokenized reinsurance — a real-world-asset token giving on-chain holders exposure to reinsurance premiums, the yield class that pays for taking on actual insurance risk rather than crypto leverage. The mint 5Y8NV33Vv7WbnLfq3zBcKSdYPrk7g2KoiQoe7M2tcxp5 is the Solana deployment; our October 6, 2026 snapshot reads $5.1 million of tracked pool liquidity and grades it A.
The honest frame is the RWA one: ONYC's yield comes from underwriting real policies — genuinely uncorrelated with crypto markets, which is the product's entire pitch — but that also means the token's value lives in an off-chain reinsurance book no scan can inspect, and the A grade covers the Solana contract, not the actuarial table underneath.
FAQ
Which is bigger, JUP or ONYC?
By tracked market cap: JUP (Solana) measures $1.15B and ONYC (Solana) measures $105.90M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, JUP or ONYC?
On the contract checks we publish: JUP (Solana) grades A and ONYC (Solana) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have JUP and ONYC performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-10-17T00:15:22, the measured snapshots show JUP at +25.2% and ONYC at +1.02%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-10-17T00:15:22; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.