HostJSOL vs JUICED — price, size and safety, side by side
JSOL (Solana) vs JUICED (Solana) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-06 / 2026-10-06.
JSOL vs JUICED — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-10-06T21:12:16
| JSOL | JUICED | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $166.28 | $1.04 |
| Market cap | $152.70M | $51.57M |
| 24h volume | $20.13K DEX | $2.11M DEX |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| FDV | $152.70M | $51.57M |
| Holders | 3,657 | 3,660 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- JSOL measures ~3.0× the market cap of JUICED
- JUICED measures ~105× the 24h volume of JSOL
- over the shared window JSOL moved +18.0% while JUICED moved +0.39%
What the data says
JSOL
JSOL comes from the generation of Solana stake pools that predates the branding wars. JPool launched its pool token back when liquid staking on Solana was a niche pursuit rather than a product category, and it has simply kept running: the mint at 7Q2afV64in6N6SeZsAAB81TJzwDoD6zpqmHkzi9Dcavn represents roughly $152.7 million of stake across 3,657 holders in HostDeFi's October 6, 2026 snapshot. In a field where longevity is the scarcest credential, several years of uneventful operation is JPool's quiet pitch.
The class mechanics hold: freeze authority revoked, so no holder can be locked; supply minted on stake and burned on unstake by the pool program — the design's engine, not a discretionary lever; value appreciating against SOL as validator rewards accrue across JPool's delegation set. One figure worth a glance rather than alarm: the deployer-associated share reads 0.038%, higher than the zero most peers show but still a couple of orders of magnitude below anything that could steer a market.
JUICED
JUICED is the page in this cohort where honesty about limits matters most, so it leads with them: beyond the name its metadata carries, this token doesn't come with a public story our read can verify, and this page won't invent one. What the chain shows at mint 7GxATsNMnaC88vdwd2t3mwrFuQwwGvmYPrUQ4D6FotXk, per HostDeFi's October 6, 2026 snapshot: roughly $51.6 million of represented value held by 3,660 wallets, a freeze authority that reads revoked, and the value-equals-pool signature that characterizes receipt tokens — staking or yield-pool shares whose worth tracks deposits — rather than free-floating traded assets.
That signature shapes how to read everything else. A receipt token's supply expands and contracts with its pool by design, so "can supply grow?" has the same answer as for every liquid-staking token this site grades: yes, mechanically, as the product operating — with the freeze-authority check (passed here) being the one that actually protects holders. The nearly four thousand wallets holding it imply a real user base for whatever the underlying product is, not a treasury parked in a wrapper.
FAQ
Which is bigger, JSOL or JUICED?
By tracked market cap: JSOL (Solana) measures $152.70M and JUICED (Solana) measures $51.57M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, JSOL or JUICED?
On the contract checks we publish: JSOL (Solana) grades A and JUICED (Solana) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have JSOL and JUICED performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-10-06T21:12:16, the measured snapshots show JSOL at +18.0% and JUICED at +0.39%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-10-06T21:12:16; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.