HostJPMX vs CRD — price, size and safety, side by side
JPMX (Solana) vs CRD (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17 / 2026-09-17T20:24:07.
JPMX vs CRD — normalized performance, 2026-09-14 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07
| JPMX | CRD | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $352.24 | $2.13K |
| Market cap | $17.16M | — |
| 24h volume | $169.51 | $4.03B |
| Liquidity | $1.11K | $1.99B |
| FDV | $17.16M | — |
| Holders | 1,298 | — |
| Age (days) | — | 1 |
| Safety grade | C | B |
Where they differ
- CRD measures ~1,795,373× the liquidity of JPMX
- CRD measures ~23,760,884× the 24h volume of JPMX
What the data says
JPMX
JPMX is the xStock for JPMorgan Chase — Backed Finance's tokenized wrapper for the biggest US bank. The mint XsMAqkcKsUewDrzVkait4e5u4y8REgtyS7jWgCpLV2C is what our scan tracks: $17.2 million market cap on $1.1 thousand of liquidity with 1,298 holders as of September 16, 2026.
The starkest cap-to-door ratio in this batch: about a thousand dollars of pool liquidity under a seventeen-million cap. The token is legitimate — Backed's structure, real claim on the stock — but the market around it is a skeleton crew, and price discovery here is a pool artifact, not a read on JPMorgan. Our scan grades it C for exactly this reason.
CRD
Four billion dollars is what CRD's venue feed claimed the token traded in a single day — on August 19, 2026, when Cirudu was approximately one day old. Put that figure next to the rest of the same snapshot: about $1.99 billion in claimed liquidity, a recorded market capitalization of zero, and no holder count at all. For scale, four billion dollars of daily turnover is what entire major exchanges do; a nameless day-old Base token reporting it while having no measurable owners is describing something that cannot exist. The parsimonious explanation is reported-figure inflation — trading volume manufactured against the token's own pools so that listing feeds repeat impressive numbers.
This page's honest scope: HostDeFi's EVM snapshot grades market structure from those very venue feeds, which is why the incoherence above is the most valuable output the capture produced. The contract itself — mint powers, owner functions, transfer taxes, honeypot mechanics at 0x95735d3f68d045c942afb9ea1090f6b03150bfab — was not assessed in this snapshot, and with a token in this category, the contract is where the actual answer lives. Run the live scan above; it reads the chain, not the feed.
FAQ
Which is bigger, JPMX or CRD?
By tracked market cap: JPMX (Solana) measures $17.16M and CRD (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, JPMX or CRD?
On the contract checks we publish: JPMX (Solana) grades C and CRD (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have JPMX and CRD performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-14 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show JPMX at −2.09% and CRD at 0.00%.
More comparisons
JPMX vs RYYJPMX vs FKBJPMX vs RDKJPMX vs CCVCRD vs RYYCRD vs FKBCRD vs RDKCRD vs CCV
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-14→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.