Open app

JOBCOIN vs CRD — price, size and safety, side by side

JOBCOIN (Solana) vs CRD (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17 / 2026-09-17T23:42:29.

JOBCOINA

$0.00427
buy instead of getting a job on Solana
Trade JOBCOIN
vs

CRDB

$2.13K
Cirudu on Base
Trade CRD

JOBCOIN vs CRD — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-17T23:42:29

100 — shared start
JOBCOIN −1.93%  ·  CRD 0.00% — both series rebased to 100 at the first measured point in the shared window; not a raw-price chart.
JOBCOINCRD
Price$0.00427$2.13K
Market cap$4.30M
24h volume$7.69K$4.03B
Liquidity$172.86K$1.99B
FDV$4.30M
Holders2,772
Age (days)1
Safety gradeAB

Where they differ

What the data says

JOBCOIN

On the two things that matter most in a token contract, JOBCOIN looks great. Minting is switched off for good, which makes the circulating supply a firm ceiling, and freeze is disabled as well, so selling is always your call. Clearing both of those in one go is a strong sign, and it's what puts JOBCOIN at 92/100 as of the 2026-09-16 snapshot.

Here's where JOBCOIN stands today: workable liquidity of $172.86K and 2,772 wallets holding as of 2026-09-16. Against a market cap of about $4.30M, the $172.86K pool is workable rather than deep — fine for ordinary size to move in and out, though a larger position would start to feel the pool's edges. The 2,772-wallet base is a reasonable spread of ownership, though a headline count doesn't show whether a few wallets dominate — the concentration read on this page speaks to that.

Full JOBCOIN safety read →

CRD

Four billion dollars is what CRD's venue feed claimed the token traded in a single day — on August 19, 2026, when Cirudu was approximately one day old. Put that figure next to the rest of the same snapshot: about $1.99 billion in claimed liquidity, a recorded market capitalization of zero, and no holder count at all. For scale, four billion dollars of daily turnover is what entire major exchanges do; a nameless day-old Base token reporting it while having no measurable owners is describing something that cannot exist. The parsimonious explanation is reported-figure inflation — trading volume manufactured against the token's own pools so that listing feeds repeat impressive numbers.

This page's honest scope: HostDeFi's EVM snapshot grades market structure from those very venue feeds, which is why the incoherence above is the most valuable output the capture produced. The contract itself — mint powers, owner functions, transfer taxes, honeypot mechanics at 0x95735d3f68d045c942afb9ea1090f6b03150bfab — was not assessed in this snapshot, and with a token in this category, the contract is where the actual answer lives. Run the live scan above; it reads the chain, not the feed.

Full CRD safety read →

FAQ

Which is bigger, JOBCOIN or CRD?

By tracked market cap: JOBCOIN (Solana) measures $4.30M and CRD (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.

Which is safer, JOBCOIN or CRD?

On the contract checks we publish: JOBCOIN (Solana) grades A and CRD (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.

How have JOBCOIN and CRD performed over the shared window?

Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-17T23:42:29, the measured snapshots show JOBCOIN at −1.93% and CRD at 0.00%.

More comparisons

JOBCOIN vs RYYJOBCOIN vs FKBJOBCOIN vs RDKJOBCOIN vs CCVCRD vs RYYCRD vs FKBCRD vs RDKCRD vs CCV

The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-17T23:42:29; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.

Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.