HostJLUSDC vs JLWSOL — price, size and safety, side by side
JLUSDC (Solana) vs JLWSOL (Solana) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-17.
JLUSDC vs JLWSOL — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-10-17T03:15:24
| JLUSDC | JLWSOL | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1.06 | $109.36 |
| Market cap | $458.81M | $24.04M |
| 24h volume | $19.92M DEX | $505.82K DEX |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| FDV | $458.81M | $24.04M |
| Holders | 13,503 | 6,839 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- JLUSDC measures ~19× the market cap of JLWSOL
- JLUSDC measures ~39× the 24h volume of JLWSOL
- JLUSDC measures ~2.0× the holder count of JLWSOL
What the data says
JLUSDC
jlUSDC is the odd one out among this site's yield tokens: it isn't staked SOL at all. Deposit USDC into Jupiter Lend and you receive jlUSDC — mint 9BEcn9aPEmhSPbPQeFGjidRiEKki46fVQDyPpSQXPA2D — a receipt that appreciates as borrowers pay interest on the pooled dollars. The October 6, 2026 snapshot records roughly $458.8 million of deposits represented across 13,503 holders, which makes it one of the larger dollar-yield venues on Solana.
Reading a lending receipt correctly means stacking its layers. Layer one is USDC itself, with everything that implies — Circle's reserves, its compliance freeze powers, the fiat-backed model (our USDC guide covers that story). Layer two is the lending market: your yield exists because someone borrowed the pool's dollars against collateral, so the risks that matter are utilization crunches (in a panic, if the pool is heavily lent out, withdrawals queue until loans repay or liquidate) and bad debt (collateral crashing faster than liquidations can clear it). Layer three is the protocol's contract surface itself. None of these showed distress in this snapshot; all of them are the price of the yield.
JLWSOL
JLWSOL — "Jupiter Lend WSOL" on Solana, mint 2uQsyo1fXXQkDtcpXnLofWy88PxcvnfH2L8FPSE62FVU — is a real Jupiter Lend receipt: the lending market's wrapped-SOL deposit token — at $101.39 per unit on a hot book: ~$293 thousand of daily volume. The October 6, 2026 snapshot reads $24.0 million across 6,839 holders.
A 184.5k-unit supply on a 6.8k file is real lending-protocol scale — Jupiter Lend is Solana's flagship lending market — and the $293k volume is a genuinely active book. Freeze revoked; mint unreported.
FAQ
Which is bigger, JLUSDC or JLWSOL?
By tracked market cap: JLUSDC (Solana) measures $458.81M and JLWSOL (Solana) measures $24.04M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, JLUSDC or JLWSOL?
On the contract checks we publish: JLUSDC (Solana) grades A and JLWSOL (Solana) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have JLUSDC and JLWSOL performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-10-17T03:15:24, the measured snapshots show JLUSDC at +0.52% and JLWSOL at +1.87%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-10-17T03:15:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.