HostJITOSOL vs JUICED — price, size and safety, side by side
JITOSOL (Solana) vs JUICED (Solana) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-06 / 2026-10-06.
JITOSOL vs JUICED — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-10-06T21:12:16
| JITOSOL | JUICED | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $157.62 | $1.04 |
| Market cap | $1.25B | $51.57M |
| 24h volume | $10.98M DEX | $2.11M DEX |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| FDV | $1.25B | $51.57M |
| Holders | 185,910 | 3,660 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- JITOSOL measures ~24× the market cap of JUICED
- JITOSOL measures ~5.2× the 24h volume of JUICED
- JITOSOL measures ~51× the holder count of JUICED
- over the shared window JITOSOL moved +17.8% while JUICED moved +0.39%
What the data says
JITOSOL
jitoSOL is not a bet on a project — it is SOL, working. Deposit SOL into Jito's stake pool and you receive jitoSOL, a receipt token whose value climbs against SOL as staking rewards accrue, topped up by Jito's specialty: MEV rewards captured by its validator client and passed back to stakers. As of the October 6, 2026 snapshot, the pool behind mint J1toso1uCk3RLmjorhTtrVwY9HJ7X8V9yYac6Y7kGCPn represents roughly $1.25 billion, held across 185,910 wallets — the largest liquid staking token on Solana.
Reading an LST with a memecoin checklist produces one famous false alarm, so let's defuse it: jitoSOL's supply is not fixed, and it shouldn't be. The stake pool program mints new jitoSOL every time someone stakes and burns it on withdrawal — that authority living with the audited pool program is the product working, not a deployer's rug lever. The check that matters for holders is the freeze authority, and it reads revoked in the snapshot: nothing can lock your jitoSOL or block an exit. Creator-wallet concentration is a non-issue by construction, since supply mirrors deposits.
JUICED
JUICED is the page in this cohort where honesty about limits matters most, so it leads with them: beyond the name its metadata carries, this token doesn't come with a public story our read can verify, and this page won't invent one. What the chain shows at mint 7GxATsNMnaC88vdwd2t3mwrFuQwwGvmYPrUQ4D6FotXk, per HostDeFi's October 6, 2026 snapshot: roughly $51.6 million of represented value held by 3,660 wallets, a freeze authority that reads revoked, and the value-equals-pool signature that characterizes receipt tokens — staking or yield-pool shares whose worth tracks deposits — rather than free-floating traded assets.
That signature shapes how to read everything else. A receipt token's supply expands and contracts with its pool by design, so "can supply grow?" has the same answer as for every liquid-staking token this site grades: yes, mechanically, as the product operating — with the freeze-authority check (passed here) being the one that actually protects holders. The nearly four thousand wallets holding it imply a real user base for whatever the underlying product is, not a treasury parked in a wrapper.
FAQ
Which is bigger, JITOSOL or JUICED?
By tracked market cap: JITOSOL (Solana) measures $1.25B and JUICED (Solana) measures $51.57M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, JITOSOL or JUICED?
On the contract checks we publish: JITOSOL (Solana) grades A and JUICED (Solana) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have JITOSOL and JUICED performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-10-06T21:12:16, the measured snapshots show JITOSOL at +17.8% and JUICED at +0.39%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-10-06T21:12:16; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.