HostJITOSOL vs INF — price, size and safety, side by side
JITOSOL (Solana) vs INF (Solana) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-06 / 2026-10-06.
JITOSOL vs INF — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-10-06T21:12:16
| JITOSOL | INF | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $157.62 | $175.59 |
| Market cap | $1.25B | $233.62M |
| 24h volume | $10.98M DEX | $2.68M DEX |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| FDV | $1.25B | $233.62M |
| Holders | 185,910 | 42,083 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- JITOSOL measures ~5.3× the market cap of INF
- JITOSOL measures ~4.1× the 24h volume of INF
- JITOSOL measures ~4.4× the holder count of INF
What the data says
JITOSOL
jitoSOL is not a bet on a project — it is SOL, working. Deposit SOL into Jito's stake pool and you receive jitoSOL, a receipt token whose value climbs against SOL as staking rewards accrue, topped up by Jito's specialty: MEV rewards captured by its validator client and passed back to stakers. As of the October 6, 2026 snapshot, the pool behind mint J1toso1uCk3RLmjorhTtrVwY9HJ7X8V9yYac6Y7kGCPn represents roughly $1.25 billion, held across 185,910 wallets — the largest liquid staking token on Solana.
Reading an LST with a memecoin checklist produces one famous false alarm, so let's defuse it: jitoSOL's supply is not fixed, and it shouldn't be. The stake pool program mints new jitoSOL every time someone stakes and burns it on withdrawal — that authority living with the audited pool program is the product working, not a deployer's rug lever. The check that matters for holders is the freeze authority, and it reads revoked in the snapshot: nothing can lock your jitoSOL or block an exit. Creator-wallet concentration is a non-issue by construction, since supply mirrors deposits.
INF
INF is a different animal from the other staked-SOL tokens on this site: it's the pool of pools. Sanctum's Infinity holds a basket of many liquid staking tokens at once, and INF — mint 5oVNBeEEQvYi1cX3ir8Dx5n1P7pdxydbGF2X4TxVusJm — represents a share of that basket, earning both the underlying staking yield and trading fees whenever anyone swaps one LST for another through the pool. The October 6, 2026 snapshot values it at roughly $233.6 million across 42,083 holders — a genuinely broad base for a product this structurally wonky.
The appeal is diversification where the LST field is most fragmented: instead of picking whether jupSOL or hSOL or bSOL wins, INF holds the field and clips fees from its churn. The cost is a second layer of moving parts. A vanilla LST asks you to trust one stake pool program; INF asks you to trust Sanctum's multi-pool machinery plus every constituent LST inside it — a stress event in any large member token transmits into the basket that contains it.
FAQ
Which is bigger, JITOSOL or INF?
By tracked market cap: JITOSOL (Solana) measures $1.25B and INF (Solana) measures $233.62M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, JITOSOL or INF?
On the contract checks we publish: JITOSOL (Solana) grades A and INF (Solana) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have JITOSOL and INF performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-10-06T21:12:16, the measured snapshots show JITOSOL at +17.8% and INF at +17.9%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-10-06T21:12:16; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.