HostJEFE vs OS — price, size and safety, side by side
JEFE (Sonic) vs OS (Sonic) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-15 / 2026-10-15.
JEFE vs OS — normalized performance, 2026-10-09 to 2026-10-15T21:43:45
| JEFE | OS | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.03251 | $0.05639 |
| Market cap | $299.30K | $128.43K |
| 24h volume | $535.97 DEX | $854.93 DEX |
| Liquidity | $19.90K | $12.61K |
| FDV | $299.25K | $128.43K |
| Holders | 28,629 | 4,426 |
| Age (days) | 75 | 630 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- JEFE measures ~2.3× the market cap of OS
- JEFE measures ~1.6× the liquidity of OS
- OS measures ~1.6× the 24h volume of JEFE
- JEFE measures ~6.5× the holder count of OS
- over the shared window JEFE moved +8.69% while OS moved +27.5%
What the data says
JEFE
The best news on JEFE is the part risky tokens usually get wrong — its contract. The contract holds no mint power, so the supply stays honest and predictable, and no wallet can be blacklisted either, so no one can hold your tokens in place. Neither lever existing is the main reason JEFE's 85/100 comes down to market factors, not contract ones (2026-10-09).
On the trading data, JEFE shows $19.90K of on-chain liquidity, 28,629 holders and 75 days old as of 2026-10-09. Encouragingly, that $19.90K pool is deep relative to a market cap of about $299.30K — the kind of ratio that lets real size move in and out without much slippage. The 28,629-wallet base is a reasonable spread of ownership, though a headline count doesn't show whether a few wallets dominate — the concentration read on this page speaks to that. On concentration, the deployer wallet holds just <0.01% of JEFE as of 2026-10-09, so the person who launched it isn't sitting on a dominant share.
OS
There's a small gap on this page — OS's contract flags weren't fully confirmed as of 2026-10-09. So rather than assume anything either way, it's worth a direct check, and the scanner above reads it live in a couple of seconds before you trade.
On the trading data, OS shows deep liquidity of $12.61K, a holder base of 4,426 and an established record at 630 days as of 2026-10-09. The $12.61K pool stands up well to a ~$128.43K cap — depth like that means OS absorbs normal flow without the price lurching. The 4,426-wallet base is a reasonable spread of ownership, though a headline count doesn't show whether a few wallets dominate — the concentration read on this page speaks to that. The creator's own position is small — <0.01% of supply as of 2026-10-09, comfortably under the 5% line the scanners flag — which is what you want to see.
FAQ
Which is bigger, JEFE or OS?
By tracked market cap: JEFE (Sonic) measures $299.30K and OS (Sonic) measures $128.43K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, JEFE or OS?
On the contract checks we publish: JEFE (Sonic) grades A and OS (Sonic) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have JEFE and OS performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-09 and 2026-10-15T21:43:45, the measured snapshots show JEFE at +8.69% and OS at +27.5%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-09→2026-10-15T21:43:45; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.