HostJAMES vs SHRAMP — price, size and safety, side by side
JAMES (Monad) vs SHRAMP (Monad) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-16 / 2026-10-17.
JAMES vs SHRAMP — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-10-16T21:15:32
| JAMES | SHRAMP | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.001862 | $0.0001801 |
| Market cap | — | $215.07K |
| 24h volume | $3.04K DEX | $1.77K DEX |
| Liquidity | $54.75K | $20.68K |
| FDV | $2.14M | $215.07K |
| Holders | 2,423 | 3,224 |
| Age (days) | 96 | 306 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- JAMES measures ~2.6× the liquidity of SHRAMP
- JAMES measures ~1.7× the 24h volume of SHRAMP
- over the shared window JAMES moved −43.3% while SHRAMP moved +11.0%
What the data says
JAMES
JAMES — "The Busy Bull of Monad" — is a 78-day-old mascot token on Monad at 0x43cf5407bda1400498b8064d50a7e17528d87777, priced at a $2.1 million market cap on the October 9, 2026 snapshot.
The measured book is thin — $54.7 thousand of tracked liquidity against the cap, with $2.3 thousand of daily volume — the profile of a chain-native mascot still finding its market. Everything structural is an open question this snapshot didn't answer: contract controls weren't evaluated and holder distribution wasn't resolved, so the bull case lives entirely on the tape.
SHRAMP
SHRAMP at 0x42a4aa89864a794de135b23c6a8d2e05513d7777 is a Monad community token 291 days into its record at the October 6, 2026 snapshot, with 3,224 holders sharing a 1.0 billion supply around an $215.1 thousand market cap.
The contract is the locked kind: mint and freeze authority are both revoked, the contract cannot create new supply, and it is not a proxy. The distribution is mid-heavy rather than extreme: the ten largest wallets hold 50.1% of supply. $20.7 thousand of deep tracked depth sees $985 of daily volume — a pool proportionate to the small cap.
FAQ
Which is bigger, JAMES or SHRAMP?
By tracked market cap: JAMES (Monad) measures — and SHRAMP (Monad) measures $215.07K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, JAMES or SHRAMP?
On the contract checks we publish: JAMES (Monad) grades A and SHRAMP (Monad) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have JAMES and SHRAMP performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-10-16T21:15:32, the measured snapshots show JAMES at −43.3% and SHRAMP at +11.0%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-10-16T21:15:32; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.