HostINF vs SUSDC-8 — price, size and safety, side by side
INF (Solana) vs SUSDC-8 (Solana) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-06 / 2026-10-06.
INF vs SUSDC-8 — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-10-06T21:12:16
| INF | SUSDC-8 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $175.59 | $1.0000 |
| Market cap | $233.62M | $122.82K |
| 24h volume | $2.68M DEX | $14.03K DEX |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| FDV | $233.62M | $122.82K |
| Holders | 42,083 | 6,253 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- INF measures ~1,902× the market cap of SUSDC-8
- INF measures ~191× the 24h volume of SUSDC-8
- INF measures ~6.7× the holder count of SUSDC-8
- over the shared window INF moved +17.9% while SUSDC-8 moved +0.01%
What the data says
INF
INF is a different animal from the other staked-SOL tokens on this site: it's the pool of pools. Sanctum's Infinity holds a basket of many liquid staking tokens at once, and INF — mint 5oVNBeEEQvYi1cX3ir8Dx5n1P7pdxydbGF2X4TxVusJm — represents a share of that basket, earning both the underlying staking yield and trading fees whenever anyone swaps one LST for another through the pool. The October 6, 2026 snapshot values it at roughly $233.6 million across 42,083 holders — a genuinely broad base for a product this structurally wonky.
The appeal is diversification where the LST field is most fragmented: instead of picking whether jupSOL or hSOL or bSOL wins, INF holds the field and clips fees from its churn. The cost is a second layer of moving parts. A vanilla LST asks you to trust one stake pool program; INF asks you to trust Sanctum's multi-pool machinery plus every constituent LST inside it — a stress event in any large member token transmits into the basket that contains it.
SUSDC-8
SUSDC-8 — "Saber Wrapped USD Coin (8 decimals)" on Solana, mint 88881Hu2jGMfCs9tMu5Rr7Ah7WBNBuXqde4nR5ZmKYYy — is the decimal-variant twin of the Saber USDC remnant: a second wrapped-USDC receipt from the Saber AMM era, still held across 6,253 wallets and still pegged at $0.9997.
The October 6, 2026 snapshot reads $123 thousand on ~$1.1 thousand of daily volume — actually livelier than its 9-decimal sibling. The "88881…" vanity prefix marks a deliberate deployment.
FAQ
Which is bigger, INF or SUSDC-8?
By tracked market cap: INF (Solana) measures $233.62M and SUSDC-8 (Solana) measures $122.82K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, INF or SUSDC-8?
On the contract checks we publish: INF (Solana) grades A and SUSDC-8 (Solana) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have INF and SUSDC-8 performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-10-06T21:12:16, the measured snapshots show INF at +17.9% and SUSDC-8 at +0.01%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-10-06T21:12:16; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.