HostINF vs JUICED — price, size and safety, side by side
INF (Solana) vs JUICED (Solana) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-06 / 2026-10-06.
INF vs JUICED — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-10-06T21:12:16
| INF | JUICED | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $175.59 | $1.04 |
| Market cap | $233.62M | $51.57M |
| 24h volume | $2.68M DEX | $2.11M DEX |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| FDV | $233.62M | $51.57M |
| Holders | 42,083 | 3,660 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- INF measures ~4.5× the market cap of JUICED
- INF measures ~11× the holder count of JUICED
- over the shared window INF moved +17.9% while JUICED moved +0.39%
What the data says
INF
INF is a different animal from the other staked-SOL tokens on this site: it's the pool of pools. Sanctum's Infinity holds a basket of many liquid staking tokens at once, and INF — mint 5oVNBeEEQvYi1cX3ir8Dx5n1P7pdxydbGF2X4TxVusJm — represents a share of that basket, earning both the underlying staking yield and trading fees whenever anyone swaps one LST for another through the pool. The October 6, 2026 snapshot values it at roughly $233.6 million across 42,083 holders — a genuinely broad base for a product this structurally wonky.
The appeal is diversification where the LST field is most fragmented: instead of picking whether jupSOL or hSOL or bSOL wins, INF holds the field and clips fees from its churn. The cost is a second layer of moving parts. A vanilla LST asks you to trust one stake pool program; INF asks you to trust Sanctum's multi-pool machinery plus every constituent LST inside it — a stress event in any large member token transmits into the basket that contains it.
JUICED
JUICED is the page in this cohort where honesty about limits matters most, so it leads with them: beyond the name its metadata carries, this token doesn't come with a public story our read can verify, and this page won't invent one. What the chain shows at mint 7GxATsNMnaC88vdwd2t3mwrFuQwwGvmYPrUQ4D6FotXk, per HostDeFi's October 6, 2026 snapshot: roughly $51.6 million of represented value held by 3,660 wallets, a freeze authority that reads revoked, and the value-equals-pool signature that characterizes receipt tokens — staking or yield-pool shares whose worth tracks deposits — rather than free-floating traded assets.
That signature shapes how to read everything else. A receipt token's supply expands and contracts with its pool by design, so "can supply grow?" has the same answer as for every liquid-staking token this site grades: yes, mechanically, as the product operating — with the freeze-authority check (passed here) being the one that actually protects holders. The nearly four thousand wallets holding it imply a real user base for whatever the underlying product is, not a treasury parked in a wrapper.
FAQ
Which is bigger, INF or JUICED?
By tracked market cap: INF (Solana) measures $233.62M and JUICED (Solana) measures $51.57M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, INF or JUICED?
On the contract checks we publish: INF (Solana) grades A and JUICED (Solana) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have INF and JUICED performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-10-06T21:12:16, the measured snapshots show INF at +17.9% and JUICED at +0.39%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-10-06T21:12:16; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.