HostINF vs FKB — price, size and safety, side by side
INF (Solana) vs FKB (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17 / 2026-09-17T23:42:29.
INF vs FKB — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-17T23:42:29
| INF | FKB | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $147.01 | $1.05 |
| Market cap | $185.62M | — |
| 24h volume | $456.25K | $2.45B |
| Liquidity | — | $2.19B |
| FDV | $185.62M | — |
| Holders | 42,032 | — |
| Age (days) | — | 1 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- FKB measures ~5,361× the 24h volume of INF
What the data says
INF
INF is a different animal from the other staked-SOL tokens on this site: it's the pool of pools. Sanctum's Infinity holds a basket of many liquid staking tokens at once, and INF — mint 5oVNBeEEQvYi1cX3ir8Dx5n1P7pdxydbGF2X4TxVusJm — represents a share of that basket, earning both the underlying staking yield and trading fees whenever anyone swaps one LST for another through the pool. The September 16, 2026 snapshot values it at roughly $185.6 million across 42,032 holders — a genuinely broad base for a product this structurally wonky.
The appeal is diversification where the LST field is most fragmented: instead of picking whether jupSOL or hSOL or bSOL wins, INF holds the field and clips fees from its churn. The cost is a second layer of moving parts. A vanilla LST asks you to trust one stake pool program; INF asks you to trust Sanctum's multi-pool machinery plus every constituent LST inside it — a stress event in any large member token transmits into the basket that contains it.
FKB
Fukabu was one day old when HostDeFi's snapshot caught it on August 19, 2026, and age is the right place to start, because every other number on this page should be read through it. In its first day of existence, FKB's venue feed claimed roughly $2.19 billion of pool liquidity and $2.45 billion of daily volume — depth that would rank it among the largest markets in crypto — alongside a recorded market capitalization of zero and no holder count whatsoever. Genuine markets do not look like this at any age; brand-new ones only look like this when the reporting venue's figures are being inflated, usually by wash trading against self-provided reserves.
What our read did and didn't do here matters. On EVM chains, HostDeFi's snapshot grades market structure from venue data; it does not open the contract. So nothing on this page speaks to whether FKB at 0xe549920f83178586c8536400862f5349c0d2d883 can mint supply, tax transfers, block sells, or be drained by an owner key — the standard failure modes of fresh Base-chain tokens. The B grade reflects only the market inputs the capture carried, and those inputs are precisely what this essay is telling you not to trust.
FAQ
Which is bigger, INF or FKB?
By tracked market cap: INF (Solana) measures $185.62M and FKB (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, INF or FKB?
On the contract checks we publish: INF (Solana) grades A and FKB (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have INF and FKB performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-17T23:42:29, the measured snapshots show INF at −1.27% and FKB at 0.00%.
More comparisons
INF vs RYYINF vs CRDINF vs RDKINF vs CCVFKB vs RYYFKB vs CRDFKB vs RDKFKB vs CCV
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-17T23:42:29; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.