HostIDL vs INST — price, size and safety, side by side
IDL (Polygon) vs INST (Polygon) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-15 / 2026-10-15.
IDL vs INST — normalized performance, 2026-10-06 to 2026-10-15T21:43:45
| IDL | INST | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.2469 | $2.30 |
| Market cap | — | $166.93M |
| 24h volume | $28.06K DEX | $155.67K DEX |
| Liquidity | $711.28K | $634.32K |
| FDV | $5.65M | $1.07M |
| Holders | 19,811 | 4,511 |
| Age (days) | 327 | 1,702 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- INST measures ~5.5× the 24h volume of IDL
- IDL measures ~4.4× the holder count of INST
- over the shared window IDL moved −15.0% while INST moved +15.3%
What the data says
IDL
IDL — InfinityDAO — is a 312-day-old Polygon token at 0x4c18406fa690faa53e5efa899a971557251af72d, priced at a $5.7 million market cap on the October 9, 2026 snapshot.
The venue read is the strong side: $711.3 thousand of tracked pool liquidity is healthy against the cap — a book deep enough that normal hands can enter and leave without moving the mark hard. The unmeasured side is the caveat: contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot, and holder distribution was not resolved, so the structural questions stay open.
INST
There's a small gap on this page — INST's contract flags weren't fully confirmed as of 2026-10-09. So it's best treated as unconfirmed rather than assumed clean, and the scanner above reads it live in a couple of seconds before you trade.
Looking at the market data, INST shows $634.32K of on-chain liquidity, 4,511 wallets holding and 1,702 days old as of 2026-10-09. The number worth sitting with is that $634.32K of depth against a market cap of about $166.93M — a thin pool for a token this size, which means a position that feels small to you can still be large for the pool: INST reprices on relatively little flow, and a sizable exit will slip. The 4,511-wallet base is a reasonable spread of ownership, though a headline count doesn't show whether a few wallets dominate — the concentration read on this page speaks to that. The creator's own position is small — <0.01% of supply as of 2026-10-09, comfortably under the 5% line the scanners flag — which is what you want to see.
FAQ
Which is bigger, IDL or INST?
By tracked market cap: IDL (Polygon) measures — and INST (Polygon) measures $166.93M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, IDL or INST?
On the contract checks we publish: IDL (Polygon) grades B and INST (Polygon) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have IDL and INST performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-06 and 2026-10-15T21:43:45, the measured snapshots show IDL at −15.0% and INST at +15.3%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-06→2026-10-15T21:43:45; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.