HostICP vs CTR — price, size and safety, side by side
ICP (Base) vs CTR (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-16 / 2026-10-15.
ICP vs CTR — normalized performance, 2026-10-06 to 2026-10-15T21:43:45
| ICP | CTR | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $3.00 | $0.01335 |
| Market cap | $1.90B | $19.00M |
| 24h volume | $979.59K DEX | $704.03K DEX |
| Liquidity | $316.44K | $310.34K |
| FDV | $810.69K | $12.91M |
| Holders | 6,579 | 3,189 |
| Age (days) | 335 | 133 |
| Safety grade | B | A |
Where they differ
- ICP measures ~100× the market cap of CTR
- ICP measures ~2.1× the holder count of CTR
- over the shared window ICP moved −14.2% while CTR moved +5.36%
What the data says
ICP
ICP at 0x00f3c42833c3170159af4e92dbb451fb3f708917 is a wrapped claim on the Internet Computer token trading on Base, 320 days into its record at the October 6, 2026 snapshot. The asset-wide $1.9 billion market cap dwarfs the $810.7 thousand fully-diluted figure priced on 275.6 thousand local units — a thin slice of a billion-dollar asset.
The local book is thin against the headline but the tape is hot: $316.4 thousand of tracked depth on $1.1 million of 24-hour volume — the pool cycling itself multiple times a day through routed flow. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
CTR
CTR passes the check that trips up most risky tokens — its contract controls. The contract holds no mint power, so the supply stays honest and predictable, and the contract can't pause or block transfers, leaving you free to trade on your own terms. Clearing both of those in one go is a strong sign, and it's what puts CTR at 100/100 as of the 2026-10-09 snapshot.
By the numbers, CTR is showing $310.34K of on-chain liquidity, 3,189 wallets holding and 133 days old as of 2026-10-09. Set the $310.34K of depth beside roughly $19.00M in market cap and it reads as moderate: comfortable for everyday trades, less so for size that begins to rival the pool itself. The 3,189-wallet base is a reasonable spread of ownership, though a headline count doesn't show whether a few wallets dominate — the concentration read on this page speaks to that. On concentration, the deployer wallet holds just <0.01% of CTR as of 2026-10-09, so the person who launched it isn't sitting on a dominant share.
FAQ
Which is bigger, ICP or CTR?
By tracked market cap: ICP (Base) measures $1.90B and CTR (Base) measures $19.00M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, ICP or CTR?
On the contract checks we publish: ICP (Base) grades B and CTR (Base) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have ICP and CTR performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-06 and 2026-10-15T21:43:45, the measured snapshots show ICP at −14.2% and CTR at +5.36%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-06→2026-10-15T21:43:45; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.